• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》:医学与耳鼻喉科学中分析性思维的诞生。

The Edwin Smith Papyrus: the birth of analytical thinking in medicine and otolaryngology.

作者信息

Stiefel Marc, Shaner Arlene, Schaefer Steven D

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, and Historical Collections, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):182-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000191461.08542.a3.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlg.0000191461.08542.a3
PMID:16467701
Abstract

The Edwin Smith Papyrus, discovered in 1862 outside of Luxor, Egypt, is the oldest known surgical text in the history of civilization. The surviving scroll, a copy of an earlier text from around 3,000 B.C., gives us remarkable insight into the medical practice of ancient Egyptians in the Nile River bed during the dawn of civilization. The Papyrus is divided into 48 cases, most of which describe traumatic injuries. The text instructs the physician to examine the patient and look for revealing physical signs that may indicate the outcome of the injury. Although in modern medicine we take for granted that the use of physical examination and rational thinking lead to an accurate conclusion, 5,000 years ago, this was extraordinary. The Edwin Smith Papyrus cast aside the prevailing magic and mysticism of that time in favor of logic and deductive reasoning. As Egyptian civilization declined during the next millennium, the teachings of the Papyrus would be lost. It would not be until 300 B.C. when Hippocrates and his disciples in ancient Greece would once again revive logic in medical thinking and teaching. It is believed that the ancient Greeks had knowledge of the contents of the Edwin Smith Papyrus and its teachings and used them as the basis for their writings. As Europe entered the Dark Ages, so did medicine yet again, reverting to spells and prayers instead of judgment and reason. Although Hippocrates teachings were recognized by some scholars during the Middle Ages, they did not make up the basis for mainstream medical knowledge. With the dawn of the Renaissance, medicine would finally purge itself of its past supernatural foundation. Hippocratic teachings were used to form the basis of modern medicine, and medical pioneers in the 17 century studied the ancient Greek texts as the origin for their ideas. Many of the concepts physicians and patients today take as common knowledge originated in the Edwin Smith Papyrus. The authors attempt to uncover some of these fundamental ideas and trace them through time until their incorporation in our modern medical knowledge base. It is the rational, logical, and advanced thinking exhibited in the Edwin Smith Papyrus that mandates its respect from modern otolaryngologists and all physicians alike.

摘要

1862年在埃及卢克索城外发现的《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》是文明史上已知最古老的外科文献。现存的卷轴是公元前3000年左右一份早期文献的副本,让我们得以深入了解文明曙光时期古埃及人在尼罗河床的医疗实践。这份纸草书分为48个病例,其中大部分描述的是创伤性损伤。文献指导医生检查患者,并寻找可能表明损伤结果的明显体征。虽然在现代医学中,我们认为体格检查和理性思维的运用能得出准确结论是理所当然的,但在5000年前,这是非同寻常的。《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》摒弃了当时盛行的魔法和神秘主义,转而支持逻辑和演绎推理。随着埃及文明在接下来的一千年中衰落,纸草书的教义将会失传。直到公元前300年,古希腊的希波克拉底及其弟子才会再次在医学思维和教学中复兴逻辑。据信,古希腊人了解《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》的内容及其教义,并将其作为他们著作的基础。随着欧洲进入黑暗时代,医学也再次陷入黑暗,转而依靠符咒和祈祷,而非判断和理性。尽管希波克拉底的教义在中世纪被一些学者认可,但它们并没有构成主流医学知识的基础。随着文艺复兴的到来,医学最终摆脱了其过去的超自然基础。希波克拉底的教义被用作现代医学的基础,17世纪的医学先驱们研究古希腊文献,将其作为自己思想的起源。如今医生和患者视为常识的许多概念都起源于《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》。作者试图揭示其中一些基本思想,并追溯它们随着时间的推移,直到它们被纳入我们现代医学知识库的过程。正是《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》中展现出的理性、逻辑和先进思维,使其值得现代耳鼻喉科医生和所有医生的尊重。

相似文献

1
The Edwin Smith Papyrus: the birth of analytical thinking in medicine and otolaryngology.《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》:医学与耳鼻喉科学中分析性思维的诞生。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):182-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000191461.08542.a3.
2
On the myth of the Edwin Smith papyrus: is it magic or science?论《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》的神话:它是魔法还是科学?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Dec;154(12):2285-91. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1523-x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
Urology and the scientific method in ancient Egypt.古埃及的泌尿学与科学方法
Urology. 2009 Mar;73(3):476-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.045. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
4
Decision making in head injury management in the Edwin Smith Papyrus.《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》中头部损伤处理的决策制定
Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(1):E5. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.23.1.5.
5
The Edwin Smith Papyrus from ancient Egypt. The world's first surgical treatise.来自古埃及的《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》。世界上第一部外科学专著。
Minn Med. 1985 Apr;68(4):277, 279-80.
6
Commentary on the significance for modern neurology of the 17th century B.C. Surgical Papyrus.关于公元前17世纪外科纸莎草文献对现代神经病学意义的评论。
Can J Neurol Sci. 1987 Nov;14(4):560-3.
7
Rational Egyptian surgery: a cranial injury discussed in the Edwin Smith Papyrus.合理的埃及外科手术:《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》中讨论的颅脑损伤
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1972 Aug;48(7):912-9.
8
Traumatic brain injuries in the ancient Egypt: insights from the Edwin Smith Papyrus.古埃及的创伤性脑损伤:来自《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》的见解。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;73(4):230-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313635. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
[The Edwin Smith papyrus in the history of medicine].[医学史上的《埃德温·史密斯纸草书》]
Rev Med Chil. 2012 Oct;140(10):1357-62. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872012001000020.
10
The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus: description and analysis of the earliest case of aphasia.《埃德温·史密斯外科纸莎草文稿》:最早的失语症病例描述与分析
J Med Biogr. 2003 May;11(2):114-7. doi: 10.1177/096777200301100214.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicinal Plants against Viral Infections: A Review of Metabolomics Evidence for the Antiviral Properties and Potentials in Plant Sources.药用植物抗病毒感染:植物源抗病毒特性和潜力的代谢组学证据综述。
Viruses. 2024 Jan 31;16(2):218. doi: 10.3390/v16020218.
2
What Ancient Egyptian Medicine Can Teach Us.古埃及医学能教给我们什么。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Jun;9:e2300146. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00146.
3
History of Neurotrauma: A tale from the Medieval Ages and the Renaissance.神经创伤史:一个中世纪和文艺复兴时期的故事。
J Med Life. 2023 Jan;16(1):1-3. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-1001.
4
Modelling of thrombus formation using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method.使用平滑粒子流体动力学方法对血栓形成进行建模。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 6;18(2):e0281424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281424. eCollection 2023.
5
The birth of neurotrauma: a historical perspective from the Academy of Multidisciplinary Neurotraumatology (AMN).神经创伤的诞生:多学科神经创伤学会(AMN)的历史视角
J Med Life. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):737-739. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-1006.
6
Review of Early Signs of Breast Implant Infection.乳房植入物感染早期迹象综述。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Oct;46(5):2152-2158. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02702-9. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Traditional ancient Egyptian medicine: A review.传统古埃及医学:综述。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Oct;28(10):5823-5832. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.06.044. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
8
A Student's Guide to Neural Circuit Tracing.神经回路追踪学生指南
Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 27;13:897. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00897. eCollection 2019.
9
A brief history of topographical anatomy.局部解剖学简史。
J Anat. 2016 Jul;229(1):32-62. doi: 10.1111/joa.12473.
10
Reduction of temporomandibular joint dislocation: an ancient technique that has stood the test of time.颞下颌关节脱位的复位:一项历经时间考验的古老技术。
Br Dent J. 2015 Jul;218(12):691-3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.438.