King Irena B, Lemaitre Rozenn N, Kestin Mark
Cancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Feb;83(2):227-36. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.227.
The utility of fatty acids (FAs) as biomarkers of total fat intake is unknown.
We compared FA changes in red cells (RCs), plasma phospholipids (PLs), and cholesterol esters (CEs) in response to a low-fat diet (LFD) and a moderate-fat diet (MFD) and assessed whether individual or combination of FAs predict LFD.
Postmenopausal women (n = 66) were randomly assigned to receive an LFD (17% of energy from fat) or an MFD (34% of energy from fat) for 6 wk. All foods were provided. FAs in diets and blood were determined by gas-liquid chromatography. FA changes between baseline and end of study were compared across diets by using t tests. FA predictors of an LFD were selected by logistic regression.
Many FAs in RCs, PLs, and CEs responded differently to the 2 diets. Changes from baseline with an LFD for palmitic acid (16:0) (3-11% increase), behenic (22:0) and lignoceric (24:0) acids (3-20% decrease, in RCs and PLs only), cis-monounsaturated FA (MUFA) (25-35% increase), linoleic acid (18:2n-6) (11-13% decrease), trans octadecanoic acids (trans 18:1) (7-20% decrease), and n-6 highly unsaturated FA (HUFA) (2-8% increase) were significantly different from changes with an MFD. Individually, 18:2n-6 and trans 18:1 were strong predictors of an LFD [receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: 0.92-0.80). A logistic regression model with trans 18:1, 18:2n-6, and vaccenic acid (18:1n-7) predicted an LFD with high specificity and sensitivity (ROC curves: 0.99).
Saturated FA, cisMUFA, n-6 HUFA, and exogenous FAs greatly differed in their response to the LFD and MFD. Parallel responses were observed in RCs, PLs, and CEs. A model with a combination of FAs almost perfectly differentiated the consumption of 34% fat from that of 17% fat.
脂肪酸(FAs)作为总脂肪摄入量生物标志物的效用尚不清楚。
我们比较了红细胞(RCs)、血浆磷脂(PLs)和胆固醇酯(CEs)中脂肪酸对低脂饮食(LFD)和适度脂肪饮食(MFD)的反应,并评估单个或组合脂肪酸是否能预测低脂饮食。
将绝经后女性(n = 66)随机分为两组,分别接受为期6周的低脂饮食(脂肪提供能量的17%)或适度脂肪饮食(脂肪提供能量的34%)。所有食物均由研究方提供。通过气液色谱法测定饮食和血液中的脂肪酸。使用t检验比较不同饮食组在基线和研究结束时脂肪酸的变化。通过逻辑回归选择低脂饮食的脂肪酸预测指标。
红细胞、血浆磷脂和胆固醇酯中的许多脂肪酸对两种饮食的反应不同。低脂饮食组棕榈酸(16:0)(增加3 - 11%)、山嵛酸(22:0)和二十四烷酸(24:0)(仅在红细胞和血浆磷脂中减少3 - 20%)、顺式单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)(增加25 - 35%)、亚油酸(18:2n - 6)(减少11 - 13%)、反式十八碳烯酸(反式18:1)(减少7 - 20%)和n - 6高不饱和脂肪酸(HUFA)(增加2 - 8%)与适度脂肪饮食组的变化显著不同。单独来看,18:2n - 6和反式18:1是低脂饮食的强预测指标[受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线:0.92 - 0.80]。包含反式18:1、18:2n - 6和vaccenic酸(18:1n - 7)的逻辑回归模型预测低脂饮食具有高特异性和敏感性(ROC曲线:0.99)。
饱和脂肪酸、顺式单不饱和脂肪酸、n - 6高不饱和脂肪酸和外源性脂肪酸对低脂饮食和适度脂肪饮食的反应差异很大。在红细胞、血浆磷脂和胆固醇酯中观察到了平行反应。一个包含多种脂肪酸的模型几乎能完美地区分34%脂肪摄入量和17%脂肪摄入量。