• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用改良抽吸器械进行鼻内镜下中鼻道抽吸培养与慢性鼻窦炎直接上颌窦穿刺培养的比较。

A comparison between endoscopically middle meatal aspiration culture using modified aspiration instrument and direct maxillary antral tap culture in chronic rhinosinusitis.

作者信息

Kirtsreesakul Virat, Chatwiwat Yanin, Laohaprertthisan Varaporn

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hal Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88(11):1591-7.

PMID:16471107
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopically guided middle meatal aspiration culture by comparing the culture results between middle meatal aspiration using the modified aspiration instrument and direct maxillary antral tap.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixteen patients with chronic rhinosinusitis underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) were enrolled. Both endoscopically middle meatal aspiration culture (EMAC) using modified aspiration instrument and direct antral tap culture (ATC) were performed before FESS. Microbiologic data were compared and analyzed for any statistical differences between EMAC and ATC.

RESULTS

The positive culture rates were 93.75% in both EMAC and ATC groups. Aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria were found in 87.5% of EMAC group and 81.25% of ATC group. The two most common bacteria in both groups were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. The association between EMAC and ATC was strong to moderate (13/16) 81.25%.

CONCLUSION

EMAC appears to be a valuable alternative to ATC for guiding bacterial-specific therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis. This modified aspiration instrument should be useful in clinical practice and serve as a cost effective procedure.

摘要

目的

通过比较使用改良抽吸器械进行中鼻道抽吸培养与直接上颌窦穿刺的培养结果,评估内镜引导下中鼻道抽吸培养的准确性。

材料与方法

纳入16例接受功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)的慢性鼻窦炎患者。在FESS术前,分别采用改良抽吸器械进行内镜下中鼻道抽吸培养(EMAC)和直接上颌窦穿刺培养(ATC)。对微生物学数据进行比较和分析,以确定EMAC和ATC之间的任何统计学差异。

结果

EMAC组和ATC组的阳性培养率均为93.75%。EMAC组87.5%的患者和ATC组81.25%的患者检测到需氧菌和兼性厌氧菌。两组中最常见的两种细菌是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。EMAC与ATC之间的关联强度为强到中度(13/16),占81.25%。

结论

对于慢性鼻窦炎的细菌特异性治疗,EMAC似乎是ATC的一种有价值的替代方法。这种改良的抽吸器械在临床实践中应是有用的,并且是一种具有成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
A comparison between endoscopically middle meatal aspiration culture using modified aspiration instrument and direct maxillary antral tap culture in chronic rhinosinusitis.使用改良抽吸器械进行鼻内镜下中鼻道抽吸培养与慢性鼻窦炎直接上颌窦穿刺培养的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88(11):1591-7.
2
A comparison of endoscopic culture techniques for chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻窦炎内镜培养技术的比较
Am J Rhinol. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):255-60.
3
Comparison of maxillary sinus puncture with endoscopic middle meatal culture in pediatric rhinosinusitis.小儿鼻窦炎中上颌窦穿刺与内镜中鼻道培养的比较。
Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):280-4. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3168.
4
Aspiration technique improves reliability of endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures in pediatric rhinosinusitis.吸引技术可提高儿童鼻窦炎内镜下中鼻道培养的可靠性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):205-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3461.
5
Comparison of antral tap with endoscopically directed nasal culture.
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200108000-00005.
6
Microbiology of sinus puncture versus middle meatal aspiration in acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.
Am J Rhinol. 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):135-40.
7
Comparison of swabs versus suction traps for endoscopically guided sinus cultures.用于内镜引导下鼻窦培养的拭子与吸引器的比较。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;37(2):185-91.
8
Endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures versus maxillary sinus taps in acute bacterial maxillary rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis.急性细菌性上颌窦鼻-鼻窦炎中鼻内镜引导下中鼻道培养与上颌窦穿刺的比较:一项荟萃分析
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jan;134(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.010.
9
Fungal cultures of different parts of the upper and lower airways in chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者上、下呼吸道不同部位的真菌培养
Rhinology. 2006 Mar;44(1):19-25.
10
Maxillary sinus puncture and culture in the diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis: the case for pursuing alternative culture methods.上颌窦穿刺与培养在急性鼻-鼻窦炎诊断中的应用:探寻替代培养方法的必要性
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;127(1):7-12. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.124847.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value of Middle Meatal Cultures versus Maxillary Sinus Culture in Acute and Chronic Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中鼻道培养与上颌窦培养在急慢性鼻窦炎中的诊断价值:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 14;11(20):6069. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206069.
2
Frequency of Bacterial Agents Isolated From Patients With Chronic Sinusitis in Northern Iran.伊朗北部慢性鼻窦炎患者分离出的细菌病原体频率
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Nov 17;8(5):239-46. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p239.