• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸引技术可提高儿童鼻窦炎内镜下中鼻道培养的可靠性。

Aspiration technique improves reliability of endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures in pediatric rhinosinusitis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):205-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3461.

DOI:10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3461
PMID:20537288
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies demonstrated that the results of endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures (EDMMC) compare favorable with those of maxillary sinus taps in adults rhinosinusitis. Studies comparing results of EDMMC and antral puncture cultures in pediatric rhinosinusitis, however, revealed a decreased correlation. Sampling by suction aspiration was considered likely to improve the reliability of culture.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the microbiology results obtained by EDMMC using swabs or suction aspiration with the results of maxillary sinus taps in pediatric rhinosinusitis.

METHODS

Thirty-one children with chronic rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Patients enrolled in 2007 (group A), underwent EDMMC using a swab, whereas those enrolled in 2008 (group B) underwent EDMMC using suction aspiration. Results obtained by EDMMC were compared with those of maxillary sinus taps.

RESULTS

In group A, 29 paired cultures were obtained from 15 patients. In group B, 30 paired cultures were obtained from 16 patients. In group A, EDMMC by swab demonstrated a sensitivity of 52%, a specificity of 100%, and a correlation of 66%. In group B, EDMMC by suction aspiration provided a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 100%, and a correlation of 87%. The difference in density of growth between EDMMC with swab and maxillary sinus tap was not significant, but the difference between EDMMC with aspiration and maxillary sinus tap was significant.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration technique can significantly enhance the reliability of endoscopy cultures in children with rhinosinusitis, probably by increasing the amount of specimen obtained.

摘要

背景

大多数研究表明,内镜下中鼻道培养(EDMMC)的结果与成人鼻窦炎上颌窦穿刺培养的结果相当。然而,比较儿科鼻窦炎内镜下中鼻道培养和经上颌窦窦腔穿刺培养结果的研究显示,相关性降低。抽吸取样被认为可以提高培养的可靠性。

目的

本研究旨在比较使用拭子或抽吸取样的内镜下中鼻道培养(EDMMC)与儿科鼻窦炎上颌窦穿刺培养的微生物学结果。

方法

共纳入 31 例慢性鼻窦炎患儿。2007 年入组的患者(A 组)行 EDMMC 时使用拭子,2008 年入组的患者(B 组)行 EDMMC 时使用抽吸。比较 EDMMC 结果与上颌窦穿刺结果。

结果

A 组 15 例患者共获得 29 对培养物,B 组 16 例患者共获得 30 对培养物。A 组中,拭子法 EDMMC 的敏感性为 52%,特异性为 100%,相关性为 66%。B 组中,抽吸法 EDMMC 的敏感性为 86%,特异性为 100%,相关性为 87%。拭子法与上颌窦穿刺培养物的生长密度差异无统计学意义,但抽吸法与上颌窦穿刺培养物的生长密度差异有统计学意义。

结论

抽吸技术可以显著提高鼻窦炎患儿内镜培养的可靠性,可能是通过增加获得的标本量来实现的。

相似文献

1
Aspiration technique improves reliability of endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures in pediatric rhinosinusitis.吸引技术可提高儿童鼻窦炎内镜下中鼻道培养的可靠性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):205-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3461.
2
Comparison of maxillary sinus puncture with endoscopic middle meatal culture in pediatric rhinosinusitis.小儿鼻窦炎中上颌窦穿刺与内镜中鼻道培养的比较。
Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):280-4. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3168.
3
A comparison of endoscopic culture techniques for chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻窦炎内镜培养技术的比较
Am J Rhinol. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):255-60.
4
A comparison between endoscopically middle meatal aspiration culture using modified aspiration instrument and direct maxillary antral tap culture in chronic rhinosinusitis.使用改良抽吸器械进行鼻内镜下中鼻道抽吸培养与慢性鼻窦炎直接上颌窦穿刺培养的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Nov;88(11):1591-7.
5
Fungal cultures of different parts of the upper and lower airways in chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者上、下呼吸道不同部位的真菌培养
Rhinology. 2006 Mar;44(1):19-25.
6
Comparison of two minimally invasive techniques for treating chronic rhinosinusitis in the pediatric population.两种治疗儿童慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的微创技术比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Oct;75(10):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
7
Microbiology of sinus puncture versus middle meatal aspiration in acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.
Am J Rhinol. 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):135-40.
8
Endoscopically directed middle meatal cultures versus maxillary sinus taps in acute bacterial maxillary rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis.急性细菌性上颌窦鼻-鼻窦炎中鼻内镜引导下中鼻道培养与上颌窦穿刺的比较:一项荟萃分析
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jan;134(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.010.
9
Comparison of swabs versus suction traps for endoscopically guided sinus cultures.用于内镜引导下鼻窦培养的拭子与吸引器的比较。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;37(2):185-91.
10
'Eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis': a common disorder in Europe?“嗜酸性粒细胞性真菌性鼻-鼻窦炎”:在欧洲是一种常见疾病吗?
Laryngoscope. 2003 Feb;113(2):264-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200302000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Value of Middle Meatal Cultures versus Maxillary Sinus Culture in Acute and Chronic Sinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中鼻道培养与上颌窦培养在急慢性鼻窦炎中的诊断价值:一项系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 14;11(20):6069. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206069.