Walker Robin, McSorley Eugene
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK.
Vision Res. 2006 Jun;46(13):2082-93. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.009. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
A novel two-step paradigm was used to investigate the parallel programming of consecutive, stimulus-elicited ('reflexive') and endogenous ('voluntary') saccades. The mean latency of voluntary saccades, made following the first reflexive saccades in two-step conditions, was significantly reduced compared to that of voluntary saccades made in the single-step control trials. The latency of the first reflexive saccades was modulated by the requirement to make a second saccade: first saccade latency increased when a second voluntary saccade was required in the opposite direction to the first saccade, and decreased when a second saccade was required in the same direction as the first reflexive saccade. A second experiment confirmed the basic effect and also showed that a second reflexive saccade may be programmed in parallel with a first voluntary saccade. The results support the view that voluntary and reflexive saccades can be programmed in parallel on a common motor map.
一种新颖的两步范式被用于研究连续的、刺激引发的(“反射性”)和内源性的(“自主性”)扫视的并行编程。在两步条件下,继首次反射性扫视之后做出的自主性扫视的平均潜伏期,与单步对照试验中做出的自主性扫视相比显著缩短。首次反射性扫视的潜伏期受到做出第二次扫视的要求的调节:当需要第二次自主性扫视的方向与第一次扫视相反时,首次扫视潜伏期增加;当需要第二次扫视的方向与第一次反射性扫视相同时,首次扫视潜伏期缩短。第二个实验证实了基本效应,并且还表明第二次反射性扫视可能与第一次自主性扫视并行编程。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即自主性和反射性扫视可以在共同的运动图谱上并行编程。