Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Wests Fed Rep. 2004;368:1118-49.
2
Oregon versus Ashcroft: pain relief, physician-assisted suicide, and the Controlled Substances Act.
Pain Med. 2002 Dec;3(4):353-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02056.x.
3
Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Jan 18:A1, A16.
4
Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 9;354(10):1079-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim060731.
5
6
Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.大法官们探讨美国对各州协助自杀行为的管辖权。
N Y Times Web. 2005 Oct 6:A1, A32.
7
The U.S. Attorney General's intrusion into medical practice.美国司法部长对医疗行业的干涉。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):447-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200202073460613.
8
The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web. 2006 Jan 19:A22.
9
Dispensing of controlled substances to assist suicide. Interpretive rule.
Fed Regist. 2001 Nov 9;66(218):56607-8.
10
Assisted suicide: court strikes down Ashcroft directive.协助自杀：法院驳回阿什克罗夫特指令。
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3):459-60.
Zotero 插件