Thal Donna J, Miller Scott, Carlson Janna, Vega Martha Moreno
San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1481-95. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/103).
This study examined the usefulness of the Nonword Repetition Test (NRT; C. Dollaghan & T. F. Campbell, 1998) with 4-year-old children and the relationship among the NRT, language, and other aspects of mental processing.
The NRT was administered to 64 children at 4 years of age; 44 had a history of typical language development (HTD), and 20 had a history of language delay (HLD) at 16 months of age. Study 1 compared methods of scoring phoneme errors to determine whether the NRT was appropriate for this age group. Study 2 examined whether the NRT differentiated HTD from HLD. Study 3 examined the relations among scores on the NRT and standardized tests of language and mental processing.
The NRT was found to be appropriate for 4-year-old children. Although all children had normal language abilities at the time of the study, the NRT (and several aspects of language and mental processing) differentiated between HTD and HLD. Relations among the NRT and other measures of language and mental processing were different from those previously reported, an unexpected finding that is inconsistent with traditional accounts of working memory and its relation to language development. Potential explanations are explored, and some directions for future research are suggested.
本研究考察了非词重复测试(NRT;C. 多拉汉和T. F. 坎贝尔,1998)对4岁儿童的适用性,以及NRT、语言和心理加工其他方面之间的关系。
对64名4岁儿童进行了NRT测试;其中44名有典型语言发展史(HTD),20名在16个月大时有语言发育迟缓史(HLD)。研究1比较了音素错误评分方法,以确定NRT是否适用于该年龄组。研究2考察了NRT能否区分HTD和HLD。研究3考察了NRT得分与语言和心理加工标准化测试之间的关系。
发现NRT适用于4岁儿童。尽管在研究时所有儿童的语言能力都正常,但NRT(以及语言和心理加工的几个方面)能够区分HTD和HLD。NRT与语言和心理加工的其他测量方法之间的关系与先前报道的不同,这一意外发现与工作记忆及其与语言发展关系的传统观点不一致。探讨了可能的解释,并提出了一些未来研究的方向。