Barthel F M-S, Babiker A, Royston P, Parmar M K B
MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 15;25(15):2521-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.2517.
We present a general framework for sample size calculation in survival studies based on comparing two or more survival distributions using any one of a class of tests including the logrank test. Incorporated within this framework are the possible presence of non-uniform staggered patient entry, non-proportional hazards, loss to follow-up and treatment changes including cross-over between treatment arms. The framework is very general in nature and is based on using piecewise exponential distributions to model the survival distributions. We illustrate the use of the approach and explore its validity using simulation studies. These studies have shown that not adjusting for loss to follow-up, non-proportional hazards or cross-over can lead to significant alterations in power or equivalently, a marked effect on sample size. The approach has been implemented in the freely available program ART (for Stata). Our investigations suggest that ART is the first software to allow incorporation of all these elements. Further extensions to the methodology such as non-local alternatives for the logrank test are also considered.
我们提出了一个生存研究中样本量计算的通用框架,该框架基于使用包括对数秩检验在内的一类检验中的任何一种来比较两个或多个生存分布。此框架纳入了非均匀交错患者入组、非比例风险、失访以及治疗变化(包括治疗组之间的交叉)等可能情况。该框架本质上非常通用,基于使用分段指数分布来对生存分布进行建模。我们通过模拟研究来说明该方法的使用并探讨其有效性。这些研究表明,不调整失访、非比例风险或交叉情况可能会导致检验效能发生显著变化,或者等效地,对样本量产生显著影响。该方法已在免费可用的程序ART(适用于Stata)中实现。我们的研究表明,ART是首个允许纳入所有这些因素的软件。还考虑了对该方法的进一步扩展,例如对数秩检验的非局部替代方法。