Sasaki Yuko, Kanazawa Masayuki, Ito Osamu, Kohzuki Masahiro
Department of Internal Medicine and Rehabilitation Science, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2006;48(1):4-13.
A low protein diet(LPD) has been prescribed to alleviate uremic symptoms, and to delay the aggravation of chronic renal failure(CRF). However, it has been suggested that LPD treatment causes malnutrition and attenuation of muscle power. On the other hand, it also has been suggested that appropriate long-term exercise training(EX) may lead to improvement of the physical fitness and quality of life (QOL) in patients with CRF. However, there is no definitive conclusion as to whether EX has any renal protective effect or not. We assessed the effects of combination therapy with LPD and EX. We also assessed the effects of a combination of these therapies and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, olmesartan (OLS). Male Wistar Kyoto rats that were five-sixth-nephrectomized were divided into 6 groups; 1) normal-protein diet(NPD); 2) NPD and EX with treadmill running(1 h/day, 5 days/week for 12 weeks)(NPD + EX); 3) LPD; 4) LPD + EX; 5) LPD + EX with OLS( 10 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks) (LPD + EX + OLS); and 6) Sham-operated(S). Systolic blood pressure(SBP) in the NPD + EX, LPD + EX, LPD + EX + OLS, and S groups was significantly lower than in the NPD group. Moreover, SBP in the LPD + EX + OLS was significantly lower than in all the other groups. LPD, LPD + EX, and LPD + EX + OLS induced a significant decrease in UP, Scr and BUN compared with the NPD group. UP in the LPD + EX, LPD + EX + OLS, and S groups was significantly lower than in the LPD group. The index of glomerular sclerosis (IGS) and relative interstitial volume(RIV) in the NPD + EX, LPD, LPD + EX, LPD + EX + OLS, and S groups were significantly lower than the values in the NPD group. IGS and RIV in the LPD, LPD + EX, LPD + EX + OLS, and S groups were significantly lower than the values in the NPD + EX and LPD groups. Glomerular ED-1 positive cells in the LPD + EX, LPD + EX + OLS, and S groups was significantly fewer than in the NPD groups. These results indicate that LPD and EX have renoprotective effects, and suggest that the combination therapy with LPD and EX provides greater renoprotective effects than LPD alone. Moreover simultaneous treatment of OLS and LPD + EX provides greater antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effects than treatment with LPD + EX.
低蛋白饮食(LPD)已被用于缓解尿毒症症状,并延缓慢性肾衰竭(CRF)的恶化。然而,有人认为LPD治疗会导致营养不良和肌肉力量减弱。另一方面,也有人认为适当的长期运动训练(EX)可能会改善CRF患者的身体素质和生活质量(QOL)。然而,关于EX是否具有肾脏保护作用尚无定论。我们评估了LPD与EX联合治疗的效果。我们还评估了这些疗法与血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂奥美沙坦(OLS)联合使用的效果。将五分之六肾切除的雄性Wistar Kyoto大鼠分为6组;1)正常蛋白饮食(NPD);2)NPD并进行跑步机跑步运动训练(每天1小时,每周5天,共12周)(NPD + EX);3)LPD;4)LPD + EX;5)LPD + EX并联合OLS(10 mg/kg/天,共12周)(LPD + EX + OLS);6)假手术组(S)。NPD + EX、LPD + EX、LPD + EX + OLS和S组的收缩压(SBP)显著低于NPD组。此外,LPD + EX + OLS组的SBP显著低于所有其他组。与NPD组相比,LPD、LPD + EX和LPD + EX + OLS组的尿蛋白(UP)、血肌酐(Scr)和血尿素氮(BUN)显著降低。LPD + EX、LPD + EX + OLS和S组的UP显著低于LPD组。NPD + EX、LPD、LPD + EX、LPD + EX + OLS和S组的肾小球硬化指数(IGS)和相对间质体积(RIV)显著低于NPD组。LPD、LPD + EX、LPD + EX + OLS和S组的IGS和RIV显著低于NPD + EX组和LPD组。LPD + EX、LPD + EX + OLS和S组的肾小球ED-1阳性细胞显著少于NPD组。这些结果表明,LPD和EX具有肾脏保护作用,并表明LPD与EX联合治疗比单独使用LPD具有更大的肾脏保护作用。此外,OLS与LPD + EX同时治疗比LPD + EX治疗具有更大的降压和抗蛋白尿作用。