Elshal Mohamed F, McCoy J Philip
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Methods. 2006 Apr;38(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010.
The measurement of soluble cytokines and other analytes in serum and plasma is becoming increasingly important in the study and management of many diseases. As a result, there is a growing demand for rapid, precise, and cost-effective measurement of such analytes in both clinical and research laboratories. Multiplex bead array assays provide quantitative measurement of large numbers of analytes using an automated 96-well plate format. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs) have long been the standard for quantitative analysis of cytokines and other biomarkers, but are not well suited for high throughput multiplex analyses. However, prior to replacement of ELISA assays with multiplex bead array assays, there is a need to know how comparable these two methods are for quantitative analyses. A number of published studies have compared these two methods and it is apparent that certain elements of these assays, such as the clones of monoclonal antibodies used for detection and reporting, are pivotal in obtaining similar results from both assays. By careful consideration of these variables, it should be possible to utilize multiplex bead array assays in lieu of ELISAs for studies requiring high throughput analysis of numerous analytes.
在许多疾病的研究和管理中,血清和血浆中可溶性细胞因子及其他分析物的检测变得越来越重要。因此,临床和研究实验室对快速、精确且经济高效地检测此类分析物的需求日益增长。多重微珠阵列分析采用自动化96孔板形式,可对大量分析物进行定量检测。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)长期以来一直是细胞因子和其他生物标志物定量分析的标准方法,但不太适合高通量多重分析。然而,在用多重微珠阵列分析取代ELISA分析之前,有必要了解这两种方法在定量分析方面的可比性如何。许多已发表的研究对这两种方法进行了比较,显然这些检测方法的某些要素,如用于检测和报告的单克隆抗体的克隆,对于从两种检测中获得相似结果至关重要。通过仔细考虑这些变量,对于需要对大量分析物进行高通量分析的研究,应该可以使用多重微珠阵列分析来替代ELISA分析。