Suppr超能文献

多重微珠阵列分析:性能评估及与酶联免疫吸附测定法的灵敏度比较

Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA.

作者信息

Elshal Mohamed F, McCoy J Philip

机构信息

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Methods. 2006 Apr;38(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010.

Abstract

The measurement of soluble cytokines and other analytes in serum and plasma is becoming increasingly important in the study and management of many diseases. As a result, there is a growing demand for rapid, precise, and cost-effective measurement of such analytes in both clinical and research laboratories. Multiplex bead array assays provide quantitative measurement of large numbers of analytes using an automated 96-well plate format. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs) have long been the standard for quantitative analysis of cytokines and other biomarkers, but are not well suited for high throughput multiplex analyses. However, prior to replacement of ELISA assays with multiplex bead array assays, there is a need to know how comparable these two methods are for quantitative analyses. A number of published studies have compared these two methods and it is apparent that certain elements of these assays, such as the clones of monoclonal antibodies used for detection and reporting, are pivotal in obtaining similar results from both assays. By careful consideration of these variables, it should be possible to utilize multiplex bead array assays in lieu of ELISAs for studies requiring high throughput analysis of numerous analytes.

摘要

在许多疾病的研究和管理中,血清和血浆中可溶性细胞因子及其他分析物的检测变得越来越重要。因此,临床和研究实验室对快速、精确且经济高效地检测此类分析物的需求日益增长。多重微珠阵列分析采用自动化96孔板形式,可对大量分析物进行定量检测。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)长期以来一直是细胞因子和其他生物标志物定量分析的标准方法,但不太适合高通量多重分析。然而,在用多重微珠阵列分析取代ELISA分析之前,有必要了解这两种方法在定量分析方面的可比性如何。许多已发表的研究对这两种方法进行了比较,显然这些检测方法的某些要素,如用于检测和报告的单克隆抗体的克隆,对于从两种检测中获得相似结果至关重要。通过仔细考虑这些变量,对于需要对大量分析物进行高通量分析的研究,应该可以使用多重微珠阵列分析来替代ELISA分析。

相似文献

1
Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA.
Methods. 2006 Apr;38(4):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010.
2
Performance evaluation of cytometric bead assays for the measurement of lung cytokines in two rodent models.
J Immunol Methods. 2008 Feb 29;331(1-2):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
3
Cytometry Multiplex Bead Antibody Array.
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2237:83-92. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1064-0_7.
7
Development of a cytometric bead array screening tool for the simultaneous detection of pro-inflammatory cytokines in porcine plasma.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013 Jan 15;151(1-2):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.09.041. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
8
Bead-based multianalyte flow immunoassays: the cytometric bead array system.
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;378:125-52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-323-3_9.
10
Solid-phase and bead-based cytokine immunoassay: a comparison.
Methods. 2006 Apr;38(4):294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.008.

引用本文的文献

5
Integrated Serosurveillance of Infectious Diseases Using Multiplex Bead Assays: A Systematic Review.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 10;10(1):19. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10010019.
7
Challenges and Approaches to Establishing Multi-Pathogen Serosurveillance: Findings from the 2023 Serosurveillance Summit.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Sep 3;111(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0296. Print 2024 Nov 6.
10
Serum biomarker levels in smokers and non-smokers following periodontal therapy. A prospective cohort study.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04196-8.

本文引用的文献

3
A comparability study of the emerging protein array platforms with established ELISA procedures.
J Immunol Methods. 2005 Jul;302(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2005.04.007.
8
10
Microsphere-based duplexed immunoassay for influenza virus typing by flow cytometry.
J Immunol Methods. 2004 Jan;284(1-2):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2003.09.016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验