Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Baltimore case--in brief.巴尔的摩案例——简而言之。
Science. 1991 Jul 5;253(5015):24-5.
2
The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.从研究型大学视角看联邦研究不当行为规范
Centen Rev. 1994 Spring;38(2):249-72.
3
Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.科研不当行为的定义与界限：来自联邦政府视角的观点
J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):286-97.
4
Scientific misconduct. Ill-defined, redefined.科学不端行为。定义模糊，重新定义。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct;26(5):4.
5
Federal actions against plagiarism in research.联邦政府针对研究领域抄袭行为采取的行动。
J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):34-51.
6
Study proposed on integrity of published data.关于已发表数据完整性的研究提议。
Nature. 1994 Oct 27;371(6500):733. doi: 10.1038/371733a0.
7
Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.防范欺诈与欺骗：科学探究中不当行为的法律层面
J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):59-71.
8
Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.评估对科研不端行为的监督
Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):157-62. doi: 10.1080/08989620500216281.
9
Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.1985年健康研究扩展法案。公法99 - 158。
US Statut Large. 1985;99(Title IV Sections 1-12).
10
Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.科研不端行为。重新开始。
Nature. 1991 Mar 14;350(6314):100. doi: 10.1038/350100a0.
引用本文的文献
1
Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research.医学研究人员对医学研究中的伦理与欺诈行为的看法。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):405-9.
Zotero 插件