• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

座椅几何形状和坐姿对NIC(最大值)长期AIS 1颈部损伤预测能力的影响。

Influence of seat geometry and seating posture on NIC(max) long-term AIS 1 neck injury predictability.

作者信息

Eriksson Linda, Kullgren Anders

机构信息

Autoliv Sverige AB, Vårgårda, Sweden; Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Mar;7(1):61-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580500413000.

DOI:10.1080/15389580500413000
PMID:16484035
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Validated injury criteria are essential when developing restraints for AIS 1 neck injuries, which should protect occupants in a variety of crash situations. Such criteria have been proposed and attempts have been made to validate or disprove these. However, no criterion has yet been fully validated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of seat geometry and seating posture on the NIC(max) long-term AIS 1 neck injury predictability by making parameter analyses on reconstructed real-life rear-end crashes with known injury outcomes.

METHODS

Mathematical models of the BioRID II and three car seats were used to reconstruct 79 rear-end crashes involving 110 occupants with known injury outcomes. Correlations between the NIC(max) values and the duration of AIS 1 neck injuries were evaluated for variations in seat geometry and seating posture. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were also calculated to evaluate the NIC(max) predictability.

RESULTS

Correlations between the NIC(max) values and the duration of AIS 1 neck injuries were found and these relations were used to establish injury risk curves for variations in seat geometry and seating posture. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values showed that the NIC(max) predicts long-term AIS 1 neck injuries also for variations in seat geometry and seating postures.

CONCLUSION

The NIC(max) can be used to predict long-term AIS 1 neck injuries.

摘要

目的

在开发用于AIS 1级颈部损伤的约束系统时,经过验证的损伤标准至关重要,该约束系统应在各种碰撞情况下保护驾乘人员。已经提出了这样的标准,并已尝试对其进行验证或反驳。然而,尚无标准得到充分验证。本研究的目的是通过对已知损伤结果的真实生活中追尾碰撞事故进行参数分析,评估座椅几何形状和坐姿对NIC(max)长期AIS 1级颈部损伤预测性的影响。

方法

使用BioRID II和三个汽车座椅的数学模型重建了79起涉及110名驾乘人员且已知损伤结果的追尾碰撞事故。针对座椅几何形状和坐姿的变化,评估了NIC(max)值与AIS 1级颈部损伤持续时间之间的相关性。还计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,以评估NIC(max)的预测性。

结果

发现NIC(max)值与AIS 1级颈部损伤持续时间之间存在相关性,并利用这些关系建立了座椅几何形状和坐姿变化的损伤风险曲线。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值表明,NIC(max)也能预测座椅几何形状和坐姿变化时的长期AIS 1级颈部损伤。

结论

NIC(max)可用于预测长期AIS 1级颈部损伤。

相似文献

1
Influence of seat geometry and seating posture on NIC(max) long-term AIS 1 neck injury predictability.座椅几何形状和坐姿对NIC(最大值)长期AIS 1颈部损伤预测能力的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Mar;7(1):61-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580500413000.
2
Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?座椅设计和挥鞭伤机制方面的知识是否能转化为对结果的理解?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S187-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387eff.
3
Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.采用 Euro NCAP 低严重度后碰撞测试配置中的两种座椅概念,对男性和女性虚拟假人模型(BioRID 和 EvaRID)进行平均模拟。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
The RID2 biofidelic rear impact dummy: a pilot study using human subjects in low speed rear impact full scale crash tests.RID2生物逼真后碰撞假人:一项在低速后碰撞全尺寸碰撞试验中使用人体受试者的初步研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Mar;39(2):340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
5
Influence of seat properties on occupant dynamics in severe rear crashes.严重追尾碰撞中座椅特性对驾乘人员动力学的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Dec;4(4):324-36. doi: 10.1080/714040490.
6
Effects of head restraint and seat redesign on neck injury risk in rear-end crashes.头部保护装置和座椅重新设计对追尾碰撞中颈部受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;4(2):83-90. doi: 10.1080/15389580309867.
7
The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.碰撞脉冲特性对七种拟议的鞭打损伤标准的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Mar;37(2):275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.002.
8
Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes.坐姿及正确使用约束装置对儿童在机动车碰撞事故中受伤风险的影响。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e305-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1522.
9
Parameters influencing AIS 1 neck injury outcome in frontal impacts.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2004 Jun;5(2):156-63. doi: 10.1080/15389580490435989.
10
Preventing minor neck injuries in rear crashes--forty years of progress.预防追尾事故中的轻微颈部损伤——四十年的进展。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Apr;52(4):428-33. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181bb777c.