Lyle Keith B, Johnson Marcia K
Department of Psychology, Yale University , New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.
Memory. 2006 Feb;14(2):197-213. doi: 10.1080/09658210544000060.
False memories sometimes contain specific details, such as location or colour, about events that never occurred. Based on the source-monitoring framework, we investigated one process by which false memories acquire details: the reactivation and misattribution of feature information from memories of similar perceived events. In Experiments 1A and 1B, when imagined objects were falsely remembered as seen, participants often reported that the objects had appeared in locations where visually or conceptually similar objects, respectively, had actually appeared. Experiment 2 indicated that colour and shape features of seen objects were misattributed to false memories of imagined objects. Experiment 3 showed that perceived details were misattributed to false memories of objects that had not been explicitly imagined. False memories that imported perceived features, compared to those that presumably did not, were subjectively more like memories for perceived events. Thus, perception may be even more pernicious than imagination in contributing to false memories.
错误记忆有时包含关于从未发生过的事件的特定细节,如地点或颜色。基于源监测框架,我们研究了错误记忆获取细节的一个过程:来自相似感知事件记忆的特征信息的重新激活和错误归因。在实验1A和1B中,当想象的物体被错误地记为见过时,参与者经常报告说这些物体分别出现在视觉上或概念上相似的物体实际出现过的位置。实验2表明,所见物体的颜色和形状特征被错误归因于想象物体的错误记忆。实验3表明,感知到的细节被错误归因于未被明确想象过的物体的错误记忆。与那些可能没有导入感知特征的错误记忆相比,导入了感知特征的错误记忆在主观上更类似于对感知事件的记忆。因此,在导致错误记忆方面,感知可能比想象更具危害性。