Fanning N F, Walters T D, Fox A J, Symons S P
Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):378-83.
The association of cervical carotid artery bifurcation calcification to future stroke risk is unknown, though coronary artery calcification is a proven indicator of heart disease risk. Severity of white matter change has been correlated with future stroke risk. We sought to use white matter severity grade on CT as a surrogate predictor of relative future stroke risk and thus correlate white matter and future stroke risk with carotid calcification grade.
We retrospectively reviewed unenhanced neck and brain CTs in 209 patients. Carotid calcification degree was scored by the Agatston method, adapted from that commonly used to quantify coronary artery calcification. White matter change severity was scored by the European Task Force for Age-Related White Matter Change scale. Both scores were measured blinded to each other, and to age and sex covariables. Association was tested by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Both carotid calcification and white matter scores were strongly, and independently, associated with increasing age (r = 0.61, P < .001; and r = 0.67, P < .001, respectively). Despite apparent association between carotid calcification and white matter scores on univariate analysis, there was no independent effect evident after adjusting for age as a covariant (r = 0.07, P = .14). Sex had no independent effect on white matter scores, though men had a marginally higher mean calcified carotid plaque load than women after controlling for age (P = .008).
Carotid calcification scores do not independently predict severity of white matter ischemia. Future stroke risk, assessed by white matter severity scores, cannot be predicted from carotid calcium scores.
尽管冠状动脉钙化是已被证实的心脏病风险指标,但颈总动脉分叉处钙化与未来卒中风险之间的关联尚不清楚。白质改变的严重程度与未来卒中风险相关。我们试图将CT上的白质严重程度分级作为未来相对卒中风险的替代预测指标,从而将白质与未来卒中风险和颈动脉钙化分级联系起来。
我们回顾性分析了209例患者的未增强颈部和脑部CT。颈动脉钙化程度采用阿加斯顿法评分,该方法改编自常用于量化冠状动脉钙化的方法。白质改变严重程度采用欧洲老年相关白质改变工作组量表评分。两种评分均在对彼此、年龄和性别协变量不知情的情况下进行测量。通过单变量和多变量分析检验关联性。
颈动脉钙化和白质评分均与年龄增长密切且独立相关(分别为r = 0.61,P < 0.001;r = 0.67,P < 0.001)。尽管单变量分析显示颈动脉钙化与白质评分之间存在明显关联,但在将年龄作为协变量进行校正后,没有明显的独立效应(r = 0.07,P = 0.14)。性别对白质评分没有独立影响,尽管在控制年龄后,男性的平均钙化颈动脉斑块负荷略高于女性(P = 0.008)。
颈动脉钙化评分不能独立预测白质缺血的严重程度。通过白质严重程度评分评估的未来卒中风险无法从颈动脉钙化评分中预测出来。