Osborne H R, Allison G T
Centre for Musculoskeletal Studies, School of Surgery and Pathology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;40(6):545-9; discussion 549. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.021758. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
To determine if, in the short term, acetic acid and dexamethasone iontophoresis combined with LowDye (low-Dye) taping are effective in treating the symptoms of plantar fasciitis.
A double blinded, randomised, placebo controlled trial of 31 patients with medial calcaneal origin plantar fasciitis recruited from three sports medicine clinics. All subjects received six treatments of iontophoresis to the site of maximum tenderness on the plantar aspect of the foot over a period of two weeks, continuous LowDye taping during this time, and instructions on stretching exercises for the gastrocnemius/soleus. They received 0.4% dexamethasone, placebo (0.9% NaCl), or 5% acetic acid. Stiffness and pain were recorded at the initial session, the end of six treatments, and the follow up at four weeks.
Data for 42 feet from 31 subjects were used in the study. After the treatment phase, all groups showed significant improvements in morning pain, average pain, and morning stiffness. However for morning pain, the acetic acid/taping group showed a significantly greater improvement than the dexamethasone/taping intervention. At the follow up, the treatment effect of acetic acid/taping and dexamethasone/taping remained significant for symptoms of pain. In contrast, only acetic acid maintained treatment effect for stiffness symptoms compared with placebo (p = 0.031) and dexamethasone.
Six treatments of acetic acid iontophoresis combined with taping gave greater relief from stiffness symptoms than, and equivalent relief from pain symptoms to, treatment with dexamethasone/taping. For the best clinical results at four weeks, taping combined with acetic acid is the preferred treatment option compared with taping combined with dexamethasone or saline iontophoresis.
确定短期内,醋酸和地塞米松离子导入联合低染料(low-Dye)贴扎是否能有效治疗足底筋膜炎症状。
一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,从三家运动医学诊所招募了31例足跟内侧起源的足底筋膜炎患者。所有受试者在两周内接受六次离子导入治疗,作用于足底最痛点,在此期间持续进行低染料贴扎,并接受关于腓肠肌/比目鱼肌拉伸练习的指导。他们分别接受0.4%地塞米松、安慰剂(0.9%氯化钠)或5%醋酸。在初始阶段、六次治疗结束时以及四周随访时记录僵硬和疼痛情况。
该研究使用了31名受试者42只脚的数据。治疗阶段后,所有组在晨痛、平均疼痛和晨僵方面均有显著改善。然而,对于晨痛,醋酸/贴扎组的改善明显大于地塞米松/贴扎干预组。随访时,醋酸/贴扎和地塞米松/贴扎对疼痛症状的治疗效果仍然显著。相比之下,与安慰剂(p = 0.031)和地塞米松相比,只有醋酸对僵硬症状保持治疗效果。
六次醋酸离子导入联合贴扎在缓解僵硬症状方面比地塞米松/贴扎更有效,在缓解疼痛症状方面与之相当。为了在四周时获得最佳临床效果,与地塞米松或盐水离子导入联合贴扎相比,醋酸联合贴扎是首选的治疗方案。