• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

莫拉司亭(粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子)联合抗生素治疗非创伤性腹部脓毒症:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。

Molgramostim (GM-CSF) associated with antibiotic treatment in nontraumatic abdominal sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Orozco Héctor, Arch Jorge, Medina-Franco Heriberto, Pantoja Juan P, González Quintín H, Vilatoba Mario, Hinojosa Carlos, Vargas-Vorackova Florencia, Sifuentes-Osornio José

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2006 Feb;141(2):150-3; discussion 154. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.2.150.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.141.2.150
PMID:16490891
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

The addition of molgramostim (recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) to antibiotic therapy for nontraumatic and generalized abdominal sepsis is effective and has a significant impact on length of hospitalization, direct medical costs, and mortality.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight patients with abdominal sepsis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were allocated to receive, in addition to ceftriaxone sodium, amikacin sulfate, and metronidazole, molgramostim in a daily dosage of 3 microg/kg for 4 days (group 1) or placebo (group 2). Antibiotics were administered for at least 5 days and discontinued after clinical improvement had occurred and white blood cell count had been normal for 48 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to improvement, duration of antibiotic therapy, hospital stay, complications, mortality, and adverse reactions to drugs.

RESULTS

Median time to improvement was 2 days in group 1 and 4 days in group 2 (P<.005). Median length of hospitalization was 9 and 13 days, respectively (P<.001), and median duration of antibiotic therapy was 9 and 13 days, respectively (P<.001). Numbers of infectious complications in the 2 groups were, respectively, 6 and 16 (P = .02); of residual abscesses, 3 and 5; and of deaths, 2 and 2. Costs per patient were 12,333 dollars and 16,081 dollars (US dollars), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of molgramostim to antibiotic therapy reduces the rate of infectious complications, the length of hospitalization, and costs in patients with nontraumatic abdominal sepsis.

摘要

假设

在非创伤性全身性腹部脓毒症的抗生素治疗中添加莫拉司亭(重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子)是有效的,并且对住院时间、直接医疗费用和死亡率有显著影响。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。

地点

三级转诊中心。

患者

58例腹部脓毒症患者。

干预措施

除头孢曲松钠、硫酸阿米卡星和甲硝唑外,患者被分配接受每日剂量为3微克/千克的莫拉司亭,共4天(第1组)或安慰剂(第2组)。抗生素至少使用5天,在临床症状改善且白细胞计数正常48小时后停药。

主要观察指标

改善时间、抗生素治疗持续时间、住院时间、并发症、死亡率和药物不良反应。

结果

第1组的中位改善时间为2天,第2组为4天(P<0.005)。中位住院时间分别为9天和13天(P<0.001),中位抗生素治疗持续时间分别为9天和13天(P<0.001)。两组的感染性并发症数量分别为6例和16例(P = 0.02);残余脓肿数量分别为3例和5例;死亡人数均为2例。每位患者的费用分别为12333美元和16081美元(美元)。

结论

在抗生素治疗中添加莫拉司亭可降低非创伤性腹部脓毒症患者的感染性并发症发生率、住院时间和费用。

相似文献

1
Molgramostim (GM-CSF) associated with antibiotic treatment in nontraumatic abdominal sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.莫拉司亭(粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子)联合抗生素治疗非创伤性腹部脓毒症:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Arch Surg. 2006 Feb;141(2):150-3; discussion 154. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.2.150.
2
Comparative study of three antimicrobial drugs protocol (Ceftriaxone, Gentamicin/Amikacin and Metronidazole) versus two antimicrobial drugs protocol (Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole) in cases of intra-abdominal sepsis.三种抗菌药物方案(头孢曲松、庆大霉素/阿米卡星和甲硝唑)与两种抗菌药物方案(头孢曲松和甲硝唑)治疗腹腔内脓毒症的对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005 Jan-Mar;3(1):55-63.
3
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with septic shock.粒细胞集落刺激因子用于感染性休克患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):448-54. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E318161E480.
4
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子逆转脓毒症相关免疫抑制:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的多中心试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct 1;180(7):640-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200903-0363OC. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
5
Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of filgrastim in patients hospitalized with pneumonia and severe sepsis.关于使用非格司亭治疗肺炎合并严重脓毒症住院患者的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):367-73. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000048629.32625.5D.
6
Human recombinant GM-CSF in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukaemia: double-blind placebo controlled trial.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7 Suppl 2:85-6.
7
Clinical efficacy, tolerability, and cost savings associated with the use of open-label metronidazole plus ceftriaxone once daily compared with ticarcillin/clavulanate every 6 hours as empiric treatment for diabetic lower-extremity infections in older males.与每6小时使用替卡西林/克拉维酸相比,每日一次使用开放标签甲硝唑加头孢曲松作为老年男性糖尿病下肢感染经验性治疗的临床疗效、耐受性和成本节约情况。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;2(3):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2004.09.006.
8
Unfractioned heparin for treatment of sepsis: A randomized clinical trial (The HETRASE Study).普通肝素治疗脓毒症:一项随机临床试验(HETRASE研究)
Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1185-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819c06bc.
9
The impact of concurrent granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective phase III study by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9901.同时使用粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子对头颈部癌患者放射性粘膜炎的影响:放射治疗肿瘤学组9901进行的一项双盲安慰剂对照前瞻性III期研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.043.
10
Early hospital discharge versus continued hospitalization in febrile pediatric cancer patients with prolonged neutropenia: A randomized, prospective study.发热性长期中性粒细胞减少的儿科癌症患者早期出院与继续住院治疗的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Nov;49(6):786-92. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21179.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting sepsis through inflammation and oxidative metabolism.通过炎症和氧化代谢靶向治疗脓毒症。
World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(1):101499. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i1.101499.
2
Tissue macrophages: origin, heterogenity, biological functions, diseases and therapeutic targets.组织巨噬细胞:起源、异质性、生物学功能、疾病及治疗靶点。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Mar 7;10(1):93. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02124-y.
3
Evolving Paradigms in Sepsis Management: A Narrative Review.脓毒症管理的范式转变:叙事性综述。
Cells. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):1172. doi: 10.3390/cells13141172.
4
Effects of ondansetron exposure during ICU stay on outcomes of critically ill patients with sepsis: a cohort study.入住重症监护病房期间接受昂丹司琼治疗对脓毒症危重症患者结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Dec 21;13:1256382. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1256382. eCollection 2023.
5
Clinical practice of sepsis-induced immunosuppression: Current immunotherapy and future options.脓毒症导致免疫抑制的临床实践:当前免疫疗法和未来选择。
Chin J Traumatol. 2024 Mar;27(2):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
6
Sepsis: Immunopathology, Immunotherapies, and Future Perspectives.脓毒症:免疫病理学、免疫疗法及未来展望
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Dec;54(Suppl1):127-132. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22314.
7
Expert consensus on the monitoring and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression.脓毒症导致免疫抑制监测与治疗的专家共识。
Mil Med Res. 2022 Dec 26;9(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00430-y.
8
Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: mechanisms, diagnosis and current treatment options.脓毒症导致的免疫抑制:机制、诊断和当前治疗选择。
Mil Med Res. 2022 Oct 9;9(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40779-022-00422-y.
9
Immune Intervention in Sepsis.脓毒症的免疫干预
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 14;12:718089. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.718089. eCollection 2021.
10
The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎中细胞因子风暴的信号通路与治疗策略。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Jul 7;6(1):255. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00679-0.