McCutcheon Craig A, Orme Ruari M, Scott David A, Davies Michael J, McGlade Desmond P
Department of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):668-75. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197777.62397.d5.
The properties of dexmedetomidine (DEX) that result in titratable sedation and sympathetic modulation suggest that it would be suitable for use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under regional anesthesia. We performed a randomized, double-blind study in 56 patients having CEA under regional anesthesia and compared hemodynamic control using DEX versus a conventional sedation technique using midazolam and fentanyl standard (STD). Sedation was titrated to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 2-4 in both groups. The primary outcome was the number of pharmacological interventions required to treat deviations of arterial blood pressure and heart rate outside of predetermined limits. We also compared recovery hemodynamic profiles, patient satisfaction, and adverse cardiac and neurological events. There was no difference in the overall rate of hemodynamic interventions (DEX 80% versus STD 79%; P = 1.0). However, the nature of interventions differed in that patients in the DEX group were less likely to require treatment for hypertension and/or tachycardia (DEX 40% versus STD 72%; P = 0.03). The number of interventions per patient for hypertension and/or tachycardia was also lesser in the DEX group (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the numbers of patients needing intraoperative treatment for hypotension or bradycardia or in the need for intraarterial shunting. In the postanesthesia care unit, more patients in the DEX group required hemodynamic drug interventions (DEX 11, 44%, versus STD 4, 14%; P = 0.03). These were primarily for hypotension (DEX 7, 28% versus STD 3, 11%; P = 0.16). The number of patients requiring no additional pain relief in the postanesthesia care unit was significantly larger for patients in the DEX group (DEX 18, 72% versus STD 11, 38%; P = 0.027). DEX provides an acceptable alternative, without superiority to standard techniques for sedation during awake CEA.
右美托咪定(DEX)具有可滴定镇静和交感神经调节的特性,这表明它适用于在区域麻醉下进行的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。我们对56例在区域麻醉下接受CEA的患者进行了一项随机双盲研究,比较了使用DEX与使用咪达唑仑和芬太尼标准(STD)的传统镇静技术对血流动力学的控制情况。两组的镇静水平均滴定至 Ramsay 镇静评分2 - 4分。主要结局是治疗动脉血压和心率偏离预定范围所需的药物干预次数。我们还比较了恢复时的血流动力学情况、患者满意度以及不良心脏和神经事件。血流动力学干预的总体发生率没有差异(DEX组为80%,STD组为79%;P = 1.0)。然而,干预的性质有所不同,DEX组患者因高血压和/或心动过速需要治疗的可能性较小(DEX组为40%,STD组为72%;P = 0.03)。DEX组每位患者因高血压和/或心动过速的干预次数也较少(P = 0.02)。术中因低血压或心动过缓需要治疗的患者数量以及需要动脉内分流的情况,两组之间没有显著差异。在麻醉后护理单元,DEX组更多患者需要血流动力学药物干预(DEX组11例,44%,STD组4例,14%;P = 0.03)。这些主要是针对低血压(DEX组7例,28%,STD组3例,11%;P = 0.16)。在麻醉后护理单元不需要额外镇痛的患者数量,DEX组显著多于STD组(DEX组18例,72%,STD组11例,38%;P = 0.027)。在清醒CEA期间,DEX是一种可接受的替代方法,但并不优于标准的镇静技术。