• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A co-created learning process in a doctoral seminar.

作者信息

Runquist Jennifer J, Kerns Roni DeLao, Fee Sharon Sweeney, Choi Myunghan, Glittenberg Jody

机构信息

University of Arizona, College of Nursing, 1305 North Martin Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jan;45(1):32-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060101-06.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20060101-06
PMID:16496735
Abstract

This article describes the co-created educational process used within a vulnerable populations doctoral seminar. The objective of this seminar was to integrate students' knowledge of vulnerable populations for the purpose of developing their program of research. Because this was the first cohort to enroll in the course, the process used to ultimately achieve the objective was flexible. This flexibility, combined with a professor who approached teaching from a philosophy of partnership, resulted in the creation of an especially mutual, intensive, and innovative learning environment. A collaborative scholarly paper, which transcended the seminar's objective, emerged from the students' enthusiasm with the learning process. The success of this learning process challenges doctoral faculty to consider how knowledge-building through mutual partnerships with doctoral students can be integrated into existing learning environments.

摘要

相似文献

1
A co-created learning process in a doctoral seminar.
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jan;45(1):32-4. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060101-06.
2
Building a Foundation for a Successful Doctoral Student Journey: A Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Investigation.为成功的博士生之旅奠定基础:一项关于教学与学习的学术研究
Innov High Educ. 2023;48(3):433-455. doi: 10.1007/s10755-022-09624-7. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Assessment of the Impact of Teaching Demands on Research Productivity Among Doctoral Nursing Program Faculty.评估教学要求对护理学博士项目教员研究生产力的影响。
J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
Research education: findings of a study of teaching-learning research using multiple analytical perspectives.研究教育:一项运用多种分析视角对教学研究进行研究的结果
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Dec;53(12):673-7. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20141120-02. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Teaching philosophy of science in nursing doctoral education.护理博士教育中的科学教学理念。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(1):87-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00087.x.
6
Preliminary evaluation of the learning outcome achieved by a nursing research seminar course for doctoral students.对博士生护理研究研讨课程所取得学习成果的初步评估。
J Nurs Res. 2008 Jun;16(2):87-96. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387294.84053.6e.
7
An online doctoral education course using problem-based learning.一门采用基于问题学习法的在线博士教育课程。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Feb;48(2):116-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090201-02.
8
The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: a literature review.国际博士生的学习经验,特别是护理专业学生:文献回顾。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Feb;47(2):239-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.025. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
9
Systematic Preparation for Teaching in a Nursing Doctor of Philosophy Program.护理哲学博士项目教学的系统准备
J Prof Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
10
Doctoral education in nursing: an assessment of quality, 1979-1984.护理博士教育:1979 - 1984年质量评估
Nurs Res. 1987 Mar-Apr;36(2):111-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Seminar-case learning model improves clinical teaching: a prospective randomized controlled trial.研讨案例学习模式改善临床教学:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
PeerJ. 2021 May 20;9:e11487. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11487. eCollection 2021.
2
Nurses' perceptions of online continuing education.护士对在线继续教育的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 20;11:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-86.