Koroglu M, Demir M, Koroglu B K, Sezer M T, Akhan O, Yildiz H, Yavuz L, Baykal B, Oyar O
Department of Radiology, Isparta, Turkey.
Acta Radiol. 2006 Feb;47(1):43-7. doi: 10.1080/02841850500406845.
To compare the success and immediate complication rates of the anatomical landmark method (group 1) and the radiologically (combined real-time ultrasound and fluoroscopy) guided technique (group 2) in the placement of central venous catheters in emergent hemodialysis patients.
The study was performed prospectively in a randomized manner. The success and immediate complication rates of radiologically guided placement of central venous access catheters through the internal jugular vein (n=40) were compared with those of the anatomical landmark method (n=40). The success of placement, the complications, the number of passes required, and whether a single or double-wall puncture occurred were also noted and compared.
The groups were comparable in age and sex. The indication for catheter placement was hemodialysis access in all patients. Catheter placement was successful in all patients in group 2 and unsuccessful in 1 (2.5%) patient in group 1. All catheters functioned adequately and immediately after the placement (0% initial failure rate) in group 2, but 3 catheters (7.5% initial failure rate) were non-functional just after placement in group 1. The total number of needle passes, double venous wall puncture, and complication rate were significantly lower in group 2.
Percutaneous central venous catheterization via the internal jugular vein can be performed by interventional radiologists with better technical success rates and lower immediate complications. In conclusion, central venous catheterization for emergent dialysis should be performed under both real-time ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance.
比较解剖标志法(第1组)和放射学引导技术(联合实时超声和荧光透视,第2组)在急诊血液透析患者中心静脉导管置入中的成功率和即时并发症发生率。
本研究以前瞻性随机方式进行。比较通过颈内静脉进行放射学引导下中心静脉通路导管置入(n = 40)与解剖标志法(n = 40)的成功率和即时并发症发生率。还记录并比较了置入的成功率、并发症、所需穿刺次数以及是否发生单壁或双壁穿刺。
两组在年龄和性别方面具有可比性。所有患者导管置入的指征均为血液透析通路。第2组所有患者导管置入均成功,第1组有1例(2.5%)患者失败。第2组所有导管在置入后立即功能良好(初始失败率为0%),但第1组有3根导管(初始失败率为7.5%)在置入后即刻无功能。第2组的总穿刺次数、双静脉壁穿刺和并发症发生率显著更低。
介入放射科医生通过颈内静脉进行经皮中心静脉置管可获得更高的技术成功率和更低的即时并发症发生率。总之,急诊透析的中心静脉置管应在实时超声和荧光透视引导下进行。