Kowalski Piotr, Skupień Elzbieta
Katedra i Zakład Medycyny Sadowej Collegium Medicum UJ.
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):282-4.
Opinioning for the State Insurance Court, which is of fundamental interest to the authors of this paper, leads them to investigate certain factors contributing to the dysfunctionality of opinion within the pension system. We have attempted to find out to what degree changes in the functioning of the health care system, restricting access to specialist diagnosis are reflected in the construction of an opinion relating to incapability to work. On the basis of our analysis, it can be concluded that the basis of the majority of arguable opinions constitutes the legal notion of "partial incapability to work", which should be understood as "partial capability to work". In the case of the suggested change of view of this problem, the majority of controversial opinions lose their validity.
为本论文作者所关注的国家保险法院提供意见，促使他们去研究养老金体系中导致意见功能失调的某些因素。我们试图弄清楚医疗体系功能的变化，即限制获得专科诊断的机会，在与工作能力丧失相关意见的形成中是如何体现的。基于我们的分析，可以得出结论，大多数有争议意见的依据是“部分工作能力丧失”这一法律概念，而这一概念应理解为“部分工作能力”。在对这一问题的观点建议发生变化的情况下，大多数有争议的意见将失去其有效性。
