Rohlfing Torsten, Sullivan Edith V, Pfefferbaum Adolf
Neuroscience Program, SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025-3943, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Mar 31;146(2):157-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
Substantial changes in brain morphology mark the course of alcoholism from development through dependence, recovery, and relapse. These changes can be characterized with deformation-based morphometry, which quantifies shape differences between anatomical structures, either in different subjects (cross-sectional) or in the same subject over time (longitudinal). Here we present analyses of data from a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study on the effects of alcoholism on brain structure. Images were acquired from alcoholic women (n=7, mean age 47.8+/-8.3 years) and age-matched control women (n=16, mean age 51.2+/-7.5 years). From each subject, we acquired two structural MR brain images, separated by approximately 2 years (mean 21.6+/-7 months). We performed two types of morphometry using log-Jacobian maps of inter-subject and intra-subject nonrigid coordinate transformations, justified by the invariance of relevant statistics (mean, standard deviation, z-score, and t-test) under changes of the spatial and temporal reference coordinate system. With all images from one time point, a cross-sectional inter-subject morphometry determined group differences between alcoholics and normal controls. We compared these results with longitudinal intra-subject morphometry based on two images per subject acquired at different times (approximately 2 years apart). Inter- and intra-subject analysis produced partially conflicting results. Whereas the intra-subject analysis indicated faster ventricular volume increases in the alcoholics (+11% per year) than in the controls (+2% per year), the inter-subject analysis showed, on average, smaller absolute ventricle volumes in the alcoholics than in the controls (-33% relative volume). These differences were confirmed by manual planimetry and were statistically significant whether tested based on difference or change, integrated over the volume of the ventricles. Other changes and group differences were consistent between the two analyses, e.g., reduction of white matter (including corpus callosum) and increase in CSF volume, and these are in agreement with established effects of alcoholism on brain structure. We conclude that intra-subject morphometry of longitudinal data is preferable to inter-subject morphometry for detecting dynamic changes due to a disease, especially when only small samples are available. Our analysis demonstrates that the distinction between group differences observed at a point in time vs. over time is not merely academic but can substantially reduce the validity of the outcomes of actual morphometric studies. This discrepancy in results underscores the importance of distinguishing between volume differences and volume changes in morphometric analyses.
大脑形态的显著变化标志着酗酒从发展到依赖、恢复和复发的过程。这些变化可以通过基于变形的形态测量学来表征,该方法可量化不同受试者(横断面)或同一受试者随时间(纵向)的解剖结构之间的形状差异。在此,我们展示了一项关于酗酒对脑结构影响的纵向磁共振成像(MRI)研究的数据分析。图像采集自酗酒女性(n = 7,平均年龄47.8±8.3岁)和年龄匹配的对照女性(n = 16,平均年龄51.2±7.5岁)。从每个受试者获取两张结构性脑MR图像,间隔约2年(平均21.6±7个月)。我们使用受试者间和受试者内非刚性坐标变换的对数雅可比映射进行了两种类型的形态测量,相关统计量(均值、标准差、z分数和t检验)在空间和时间参考坐标系变化下的不变性证明了这种方法的合理性。利用一个时间点的所有图像,横断面受试者间形态测量确定了酗酒者与正常对照之间的组间差异。我们将这些结果与基于每个受试者在不同时间(相隔约2年)获取的两张图像的纵向受试者内形态测量结果进行了比较。受试者间和受试者内分析产生了部分相互矛盾的结果。受试者内分析表明,酗酒者的脑室体积增加速度(每年+11%)比对照组(每年+2%)更快,而受试者间分析显示,酗酒者的绝对脑室体积平均比对照组小(相对体积-33%)。这些差异通过手动平面测量得到证实,并且无论基于差异还是变化进行测试,在脑室体积上进行积分时,差异均具有统计学意义。两种分析之间的其他变化和组间差异是一致的,例如白质(包括胼胝体)减少和脑脊液体积增加,这些与酗酒对脑结构的既定影响相符。我们得出结论,对于检测疾病引起的动态变化,纵向数据的受试者内形态测量比受试者间形态测量更可取,尤其是在样本量较小时。我们的分析表明,在某个时间点观察到的组间差异与随时间变化的组间差异之间的区别不仅仅是学术性的,而且会显著降低实际形态测量研究结果的有效性。结果的这种差异强调了在形态测量分析中区分体积差异和体积变化的重要性。