Suppr超能文献

右胫骨截肢术后的驾驶踏板反应时间。

Driving pedal reaction times after right transtibial amputations.

作者信息

Meikle Ben, Devlin Michael, Pauley Tim

机构信息

Division of Physiatry, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if right transtibial amputees have the potential to safely operate the foot pedals of a vehicle with their prosthetic foot, and to determine which of 4 driving techniques is associated with the fastest reaction times.

DESIGN

Repeated measures.

SETTING

Outpatient amputee clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten subjects with right-sided, transtibial amputations.

INTERVENTION

Brake pedal response times were measured using 4 different driving techniques: right-sided accelerator with (1) prosthesis operating both the accelerator and brake pedals, (2) prosthesis operating the accelerator and left foot operating the brake, (3) left foot operating both the accelerator and brake, and (4) left-sided accelerator with the left foot operating both the accelerator and brake.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reaction time, movement time, total response time, and pedal configuration preference.

RESULTS

Total response times were slowest using a 2-footed driving technique (P<.001). Total response times were comparable using a left-sided accelerator versus the prosthesis. Using the left foot to operate both the accelerator and brake in a conventional right-footed accelerator design led to the fastest reaction (P<.001) and total response times (P<.01), although it is unclear if this is a realistic driving technique for all amputees.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that right transtibial amputees should be instructed not to drive with a 2-footed technique, and that they have similar pedal response times using their prosthesis when compared with a left-sided accelerator.

摘要

目的

确定右小腿截肢者是否有潜力用其假肢安全操作车辆的脚踏板,并确定四种驾驶技术中哪一种与最快的反应时间相关。

设计

重复测量。

地点

门诊截肢者诊所。

参与者

十名右侧小腿截肢者。

干预措施

使用四种不同的驾驶技术测量制动踏板反应时间:右侧加速踏板,(1)假肢操作加速踏板和制动踏板,(2)假肢操作加速踏板,左脚操作制动踏板,(3)左脚操作加速踏板和制动踏板,以及(4)左侧加速踏板,左脚操作加速踏板和制动踏板。

主要观察指标

反应时间、动作时间、总反应时间和踏板配置偏好。

结果

使用双脚驾驶技术时总反应时间最慢(P<0.001)。使用左侧加速踏板与使用假肢时的总反应时间相当。在传统的右脚加速踏板设计中,用左脚操作加速踏板和制动踏板导致最快的反应(P<0.001)和总反应时间(P<0.01),尽管尚不清楚这对所有截肢者来说是否是一种现实的驾驶技术。

结论

我们的结果表明,应指导右小腿截肢者不要采用双脚驾驶技术,并且与左侧加速踏板相比,他们使用假肢时的踏板反应时间相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验