• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性单侧胫骨截肢后,同时进行认知任务对脚踏板反应时间的影响。

Influence of a concurrent cognitive task on foot pedal reaction time following traumatic, unilateral transtibial amputation.

机构信息

Clinical Evaluation and Research Unit, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):1020-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0880.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-0880
PMID:22031348
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of a secondary task on foot pedal reaction time, movement time and total response time in patients with transtibial amputation.

DESIGN

Controlled trial without randomization.

SUBJECTS

Ten patients with transtibial amputation and 13 age-matched controls.

METHODS

Foot pedal reaction time and movement time were measured for both legs under simple and dual-task conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of a secondary task on foot pedal reaction time, movement time and total response time in patients with transtibial amputation.

DESIGN

Controlled trial without randomization.

SUBJECTS

Ten patients with transtibial amputation and 13 age-matched controls.

METHODS

Foot pedal reaction time and movement time were measured for both legs under simple and dual-task conditions.

RESULTS

While mean simple reaction time was similar for both groups (258 (standard deviation (SD) 53) vs 239 (SD 34) ms), a group by reaction time condition interaction (p < 0.05)identified a disproportionately greater mean dual-task effect among patients with transtibial amputation (432 (SD 109)vs 317 (SD 63) ms), apparently affecting the prosthetic and intact legs equally (426 (SD 110) vs 438 (SD 107) ms). Among patients with transtibial amputation faster movement time was achieved with the intact leg (185 (SD 61) vs 232 (SD 58)ms, p < 0.0001). Compared with controls, patients with transtibialamputation demonstrated impaired mean movement time (142 (SD 37) vs 208 (SD 64) ms, p < 0.001) and total response time (420 (SD 80) vs 552 (SD 151) ms, p < 0.001) regard less of reaction time condition.

CONCLUSION

This study appears to have identified a functional manifestation of central reorganization following patients with transtibial amputation, affecting the prosthetic and intact lower limbs equally.

摘要

目的

评估在小腿截肢患者中,次要任务对脚踏板反应时间、运动时间和总反应时间的影响。

设计

无随机对照的临床试验。

受试者

10 名小腿截肢患者和 13 名年龄匹配的对照者。

方法

在简单和双重任务条件下,分别测量双腿的脚踏板反应时间和运动时间。

结果

虽然两组的平均简单反应时间相似(患者组 258(标准差 53)ms,对照组 239(标准差 34)ms),但组间反应时间条件的交互作用(p<0.05)表明,小腿截肢患者的平均双重任务效应更大(患者组 432(标准差 109)ms,对照组 317(标准差 63)ms),这显然会平等地影响假肢和完好腿(患者组 426(标准差 110)ms,对照组 438(标准差 107)ms)。在小腿截肢患者中,完好腿的运动时间更快(185(标准差 61)ms,p<0.0001)。与对照组相比,小腿截肢患者的平均运动时间(患者组 142(标准差 37)ms,对照组 208(标准差 64)ms,p<0.001)和总反应时间(患者组 420(标准差 80)ms,对照组 552(标准差 151)ms,p<0.001)均较差,而与反应时间条件无关。

结论

本研究似乎已经确定了小腿截肢患者中枢重组的一种功能表现,平等地影响假肢和完好的下肢。

相似文献

1
Influence of a concurrent cognitive task on foot pedal reaction time following traumatic, unilateral transtibial amputation.创伤性单侧胫骨截肢后,同时进行认知任务对脚踏板反应时间的影响。
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):1020-6. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0880.
2
Driving pedal reaction times after right transtibial amputations.右胫骨截肢术后的驾驶踏板反应时间。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Mar;87(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.001.
3
Effectiveness of force production in persons with unilateral transtibial amputation during cycling.单侧胫骨截肢者在骑行过程中的力量产生效果。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Dec;35(4):373-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364611423129. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on lower limb reaction time among stroke survivors with right- or left-hemiplegia.一项并发认知任务对右偏瘫或左偏瘫中风幸存者下肢反应时间的影响。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015 Oct;22(5):342-8. doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000041. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of foot pedal reaction time among patients with right or left hemiplegia and able-bodied controls.比较右侧或左侧偏瘫患者与健康对照组的脚踏反应时间。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):500-8. doi: 10.1310/tsr2006-500.
6
High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation.经胫骨截肢患者在跑步机上行走时避开障碍物的失败率很高。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.009.
7
Comparison of vacuum-formed removable rigid dressing with conventional rigid dressing after transtibial amputation: similar outcome in a randomized controlled trial involving 27 patients.经胫骨截肢术后真空成型可移除刚性敷料与传统刚性敷料的比较:一项涉及27名患者的随机对照试验中的相似结果
Acta Orthop. 2008 Jun;79(3):361-9. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015265.
8
Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.在使用胫骨假体的截肢者中,对线不良对步态中承窝反作用力矩的影响。
Gait Posture. 2013 Apr;37(4):620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
9
Comparison of stability limits in men with traumatic transtibial amputation and a nonamputee control group.创伤性经胫骨截肢男性与非截肢对照组稳定性极限的比较。
PM R. 2015 Feb;7(2):123-9; quiz 129. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.08.953. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
10
Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees.单侧胫部截肢者步态中动力学变量的变异性
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Jun;36(2):225-30. doi: 10.1177/0309364612439572. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of the CYBERLEGs motorized lower limb prosthetic device during simulated daily activities.CYBERLEGs电动下肢假肢装置在模拟日常活动中的性能。
Wearable Technol. 2021 Nov 22;2:e15. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2021.15. eCollection 2021.
2
Mechanisms of neuro-robotic prosthesis operation in leg amputees.腿部截肢者神经机器人假肢的操作机制。
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 21;7(17). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8354. Print 2021 Apr.
3
Driving evaluation methods for able-bodied persons and individuals with lower extremity disabilities: a review of assessment modalities.
健全人和下肢残疾个体的驾驶评估方法:评估方式综述
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Sep;70(9):638-47. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)08.