在选择优质囊胚方面，序贯胚胎评估优于研究者主导的形态学评估。
Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst.
作者信息
Neuber Evelyn, Mahutte Neal G, Arici Aydin, Sakkas Denny
机构信息
Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
出版信息
Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):794-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.064.
Two selection methods (morphology-only and a sequential embryo assessment algorithm) were compared within the same IVF clinic to determine which method best identifies the embryos on day 3 that will develop into the highest quality on day 5. The sequential embryo assessment algorithm was significantly better at selecting the best embryo and selecting a blastocyst compared with the morphology-only method.
在同一试管婴儿诊所内比较了两种选择方法（仅形态学方法和序贯胚胎评估算法），以确定哪种方法能最好地识别出第3天的胚胎，这些胚胎在第5天会发育成最高质量的胚胎。与仅形态学方法相比，序贯胚胎评估算法在选择最佳胚胎和选择囊胚方面明显更优。
Zotero 插件