• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[人类第3天卵裂期胚胎玻璃化冷冻与慢速冷冻的比较:玻璃化冷冻后的发育及妊娠结局]

[Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].

作者信息

Li Yuan, Chen Zi-jiang, Yang Hui-jun, Zhong Wan-xia, Ma Shui-ying, Li Mei

机构信息

Reproductive Medical Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;42(11):753-5.

PMID:18307902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of vitrification with slow-freezing on the developmental ability of day 3 cleavage stage embryos.

METHODS

Patients who had no less than 4 high quality embryos were included in this study. These embryos were cryopreserved using the methods of vitrification or slow-freezing. In the cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles, the embryos which were cryopreserved using one of the methods were chosen randomly. The developmental ability of embryos was compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included in this study with 160 embryos. In the group of slow-freezing, 73 (91%) embryos were survived and achieved 15 (38%) clinical pregnancies. Among these, 3 were twins and the implantation rate was 25% (18/73). In the group of vitrification, 71 (89%) embryos were survived and achieved 19 (48%) clinical pregnancies. Among these, 9 were twins and the implantation rate was 39% (28/71), which was significantly higher than the slow-freezing group (P < 0.05). Otherwise, the clinical pregnant rate and multiple pregnant rate was higher in the group of vitrification than the slow-freezing group, but had no significance.

CONCLUSION

Vitrification is more benefit for the developmental ability of the thawed embryos and more suitable for the cryopreservation of day 3 cleavage stage embryos.

摘要

目的

比较玻璃化冷冻与慢速冷冻对第3天卵裂期胚胎发育能力的影响。

方法

本研究纳入至少有4枚优质胚胎的患者。这些胚胎采用玻璃化冷冻或慢速冷冻方法进行冷冻保存。在冷冻胚胎移植周期中,随机选择采用其中一种方法冷冻保存的胚胎。比较两组胚胎的发育能力。

结果

本研究共纳入80例患者,160枚胚胎。在慢速冷冻组,73枚(91%)胚胎存活,获得15例(38%)临床妊娠。其中,3例为双胎妊娠,着床率为25%(18/73)。在玻璃化冷冻组,71枚(89%)胚胎存活,获得19例(48%)临床妊娠。其中,9例为双胎妊娠,着床率为39%(28/71),显著高于慢速冷冻组(P<0.05)。此外,玻璃化冷冻组的临床妊娠率和多胎妊娠率高于慢速冷冻组,但差异无统计学意义。

结论

玻璃化冷冻对解冻后胚胎的发育能力更有益,更适合第3天卵裂期胚胎的冷冻保存。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].[人类第3天卵裂期胚胎玻璃化冷冻与慢速冷冻的比较:玻璃化冷冻后的发育及妊娠结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;42(11):753-5.
2
A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.一项关于人类第三天胚胎通过慢速冷冻或玻璃化冷冻保存的随机对照研究:玻璃化冷冻与更高的存活率、代谢率和囊胚形成率相关。
Hum Reprod. 2008 Sep;23(9):1976-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den222. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
3
Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?通过玻璃化或慢速冷冻对人类胚胎进行冷冻保存:哪种方法更好?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;21(3):270-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283297dd6.
4
Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.玻璃化冷冻法对第 2-3 天的胚胎进行冷冻保存比慢速冷冻法效果更好。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;30(3):202-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2013.875995. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.玻璃化冷冻解冻第 4 天胚胎行第 3 天卵裂期活检的结局。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
6
Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.玻璃化或慢速冷冻后细胞丢失对人第三天胚胎体外进一步发育和植入的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2943-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det356. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
7
Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification.在KSOM或SOF中培养并通过慢速冷冻或玻璃化冷冻保存的体外受精牛胚胎的比较。
Theriogenology. 2004 Aug;62(3-4):437-49. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.020.
8
[Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].[早期卵裂阶段胚胎玻璃化冷冻与慢速冷冻过程的结果比较。首例法国出生报告]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Mar;40(3):158-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
9
Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.基因型对小鼠胚胎玻璃化或慢速冷冻法冷冻保存效率的影响。
Mol Reprod Dev. 1995 Apr;40(4):429-35. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080400406.
10
Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.玻璃化冷冻第三天卵裂期胚胎的活产率高于常规慢速冷冻:一项 RCT 研究。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1820-30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev134. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.辅助生殖技术中卵母细胞、胚胎和囊胚冷冻保存:比较慢速冷冻与玻璃化冷冻的系统评价和荟萃分析,为制定全球指南提供证据。
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038.
2
Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study.胚胎形态和形态测量对解冻后第3天玻璃化胚胎着床的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Jul 30;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0175-8.
3
Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
在应用于第3天胚胎冷冻保存时,慢速冷冻不应完全被玻璃化替代:对5613个冷冻周期的分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Sep;32(9):1371-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0545-8. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Female fertility: is it safe to "freeze?".女性生育能力:“冷冻”是否安全?
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Feb 5;128(3):390-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.150115.
5
Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study.单卵裂期胚胎两次单冻胚移植(eSFET)与双冻胚移植(DFET)后的累积活产率:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Dec;31(12):1621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0346-5. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
6
Outcomes of day 3 embryo transfer with vitrification using Cryoleaf: a 3-year follow-up study.使用 Cryoleaf 进行玻璃化 3 天胚胎移植的结局:一项 3 年随访研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Sep;29(9):883-9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9814-y. Epub 2012 Jun 10.