Rance Mélanie, Morio Béatrice, Courteix Daniel, Bedu Mario, Van Praagh Emmanuel, Duché Pascale
Laboratory of Exercise Biology, Blaise Pascal and Auvergne Universities, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ann Hum Biol. 2006 Jan-Feb;33(1):89-99. doi: 10.1080/03014460500446319.
The study evaluated, in active elderly women, the accuracy and bias of anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for lower-limb and whole-body tissue composition measures using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the criterion method.
Nineteen individuals (66.1 +/- 4.2 years) participated in the study. Whole-body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by anthropometry, BIA and DXA. Lower-limb volume (LLV) and lower-limb FFM (LLFFM) were assessed by anthropometry and DXA.
LLV and LLFFM were significantly overestimated by anthropometry vs. DXA (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but significant relationships were observed [coefficient of determination (R(2)) > 0.25, p < 0.05]. No significant difference was observed between FM(A) (where (A) stands for anthropometry) vs. FM(DXA) and FFM(A) vs. FFM(DXA) and significant relationships were observed [R(2) = 0.93, p < 0.001, coefficient of variation (CV) = 7.3%; and R(2) = 0.85, p < 0.001, CV = 4.4%, respectively]. No significant difference was observed between FM(BIA) and FM(DXA) and a significant relationship was observed (R(2) = 0.80, p < 0.001, CV = 11.6%). FFM was significantly underestimated by BIA vs. DXA (p < 0.01).
In active elderly women, (i) compared with DXA, anthropometry overestimates LLV and LLFFM; (ii) anthropometry can be an accurate method for assessing whole-body composition; and (iii) despite a non-significant bias for the FM measurement, the BIA tends to overestimate FM and underestimate FFM.
本研究以双能X线吸收法(DXA)作为标准方法,评估活跃老年女性中人体测量学和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)用于测量下肢及全身组织成分的准确性和偏差。
19名个体(66.1±4.2岁)参与了本研究。通过人体测量学、BIA和DXA测量全身脂肪量(FM)和去脂体重(FFM)。通过人体测量学和DXA评估下肢体积(LLV)和下肢去脂体重(LLFFM)。
与DXA相比,人体测量学显著高估了LLV和LLFFM(分别为p<0.05和p<0.001),但观察到显著相关性[决定系数(R²)>0.25,p<0.05]。FM(A)(其中(A)代表人体测量学)与FM(DXA)之间以及FFM(A)与FFM(DXA)之间未观察到显著差异,但观察到显著相关性[R² = 0.93,p<0.001,变异系数(CV)= 7.3%;以及R² = 0.85,p<0.001,CV = 4.4%,分别]。FM(BIA)与FM(DXA)之间未观察到显著差异,但观察到显著相关性(R² = 0.80,p<0.001,CV = 11.6%)。与DXA相比,BIA显著低估了FFM(p<0.01)。
在活跃老年女性中,(i)与DXA相比,人体测量学高估了LLV和LLFFM;(ii)人体测量学可以是评估全身成分的准确方法;(iii)尽管FM测量存在不显著的偏差,但BIA倾向于高估FM并低估FFM。