Williams Peter, Yeatman Heather, Ridges Leisa, Houston Annalie, Rafferty Jillianan, Ridges Anna, Roesler Leisa, Sobierajski Megan, Spratt Bronwyn
Smart Foods Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006;15(1):10-20.
Australia and New Zealand are currently reviewing the regulations governing nutrition function, health and related claims on foods. Health claims currently are not permitted on food labels, with one exception. The aim of this study was to describe the use of such claims on packaged food for sale in Australia (excluding nutrient content claims) prior to any changes to the regulations, and measure compliance with existing regulations. A survey was conducted of the labelling of 7850 products (including multiple pack sizes of individual foods) in 47 different food categories on sale in New South Wales in 2003. A total of 2098 nutrition function, health or related claims and 12 therapeutic claims were recorded. Fourteen percent of products carried some sort of claim. If nutrient function and general health maintenance claims are excluded, 8.1% of products carried a health or related claim. Using the claims categorisation proposed by Food Standards Australia New Zealand for a new standard on claims, general-level claims were found on 9.8% of products and high-level and therapeutic claims (illegal at the time) on 1.2%. The food categories with the highest proportion of products carrying claims were sports drinks (92%), energy drinks (84%), sports bars (57%) and breakfast cereals (54%). 118 high-level and therapeutic claims did not conform to current food standards and there were many general-level claims for ingredient benefits that were unlikely to be able to be scientifically substantiated. The results of this survey suggest that more than 5% of claims were not complying with the current regulations and that the standards were not being fully enforced. To be effective, the new standard will need to be accompanied by clear guidelines for manufacturers on requirements for substantiating claims. Comprehensive education and enforcement frameworks also will be needed, to reduce the number of illegal or apparently unsubstantiated claims.
澳大利亚和新西兰目前正在审查有关食品营养功能、健康及相关声明的管理规定。目前,食品标签上不允许出现健康声明,但有一种情况除外。本研究的目的是在法规变更之前,描述澳大利亚在售包装食品(不包括营养成分声明)上此类声明的使用情况,并衡量对现有法规的遵守情况。2003年,对新南威尔士州在售的47种不同食品类别中的7850种产品(包括单个食品的多种包装规格)的标签进行了调查。共记录了2098条营养功能、健康或相关声明以及12条治疗声明。14%的产品带有某种声明。如果排除营养功能和一般健康维护声明,8.1%的产品带有健康或相关声明。根据澳大利亚和新西兰食品标准局针对新的声明标准提出的声明分类,9.8%的产品带有一般水平的声明,1.2%的产品带有高水平和治疗声明(当时属非法)。带有声明的产品比例最高的食品类别是运动饮料(92%)、能量饮料(84%)、运动棒(57%)和早餐谷物(54%)。118条高水平和治疗声明不符合现行食品标准,还有许多关于成分益处的一般水平声明不太可能得到科学证实。本次调查结果表明,超过5%的声明不符合现行法规,且标准未得到充分执行。要使新标准有效,需要为制造商提供关于声明 substantiating要求的明确指导方针。还需要全面的教育和执法框架,以减少非法或明显未经证实的声明数量。