• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床决策中的贴现与风险特征。

Discounting and risk characteristics in clinical decision-making.

作者信息

Ortendahl Monica, Fries James F

机构信息

Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2006 Mar;12(3):RA41-5. Epub 2006 Feb 23.

PMID:16501432
Abstract

Time-related aspects have attracted an increasing interest in medical decisions. Health promotion often works toward remote goals, and many clinical judgments and decisions include an exchange of costs today for benefits in the future. The concept of diminishing value over time is positive discounting when the benefits occur so far in the future that they seem of little value relative to the immediate cost. If there is a preference to live for the present rather than save for the future, such a preference might not contribute to good health according to a lower discount rate. As discounting is related to risk an analysis of uncertainty is required being an unavoidable condition in health work. Shared decision-making between doctor and patient has increasingly been emphasized, where risk characteristics and time-related aspects should be taken into account to reach a decision based upon mutual agreement. The framework of time and risk for analysis can perform a useful role in clinical judgments and decisions, where framing of different features of risk might diminish discounting and increase compliance to treatment. A summary of valuation factors in medical decision making is presented: (a) long-term decisions are sensitive to discount rates; (b) discount rates vary by domain, by outcome, by individuals and by level of certainty; (c) probability discounting is used if the risk is perceived as controllable; (d) the doctor uses expected value, the patient is risk aversive; (e) asymmetric discounting for patients and doctors gives poor compliance; (f) discount rates are influenced by framing.

摘要

与时间相关的因素在医学决策中越来越受到关注。健康促进往往致力于实现远期目标,许多临床判断和决策都涉及到用当下的成本换取未来的收益。当收益在遥远的未来才会出现,以至于相对于当前成本而言显得价值不大时,随着时间推移价值递减的概念就是正向贴现。如果存在更倾向于当下生活而非为未来储蓄的偏好,根据较低的贴现率,这种偏好可能无助于健康。由于贴现与风险相关,因此需要对不确定性进行分析,而这在医疗工作中是不可避免的情况。医生与患者之间的共同决策越来越受到重视,在共同决策时应考虑风险特征和与时间相关的因素,以便基于双方的共识做出决策。时间和风险分析框架在临床判断和决策中可以发挥有益作用,其中对不同风险特征的构建可能会减少贴现并提高对治疗的依从性。本文介绍了医学决策中估值因素的总结:(a)长期决策对贴现率敏感;(b)贴现率因领域、结果、个体和确定性水平而异;(c)如果风险被视为可控,则使用概率贴现;(d)医生使用期望值,患者厌恶风险;(e)患者和医生的非对称贴现会导致依从性差;(f)贴现率受框架影响。

相似文献

1
Discounting and risk characteristics in clinical decision-making.临床决策中的贴现与风险特征。
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Mar;12(3):RA41-5. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
2
Framing health messages based on anomalies in time preference.基于时间偏好异常构建健康信息。
Med Sci Monit. 2005 Aug;11(8):RA253-6. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
3
Discounting in health care decision-making: time for a change?医疗保健决策中的贴现:是时候做出改变了吗?
J Public Health Med. 1992 Sep;14(3):250-6.
4
Time-related issues with application to health gains and losses.与健康得失相关的时间问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Sep;55(9):843-8. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00447-x.
5
A low tension between individual and societal time aspects in health improved outcomes.个体与社会健康时间维度之间的低张力改善了结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.018. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
6
Models based on value and probability in health improve shared decision making.基于健康方面的价值和概率的模型有助于改善共同决策。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):714-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00931.x.
7
Using discounting biases, risk characteristics, and perceived control improves preventive programs.利用折扣偏差、风险特征和感知控制可改善预防计划。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2007 Jun;3(2):81-5.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
Shared decision-making in the context of menopausal health: where do we stand?更年期健康背景下的共同决策:我们目前的状况如何?
Maturitas. 2009 Jul 20;63(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.01.013. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
10
Time preference, time discounting, and smoking decisions.时间偏好、时间贴现与吸烟决策。
J Health Econ. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):927-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to Benefit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis.肺癌筛查的获益时间:一项系统评价与生存Meta分析
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Aug;69(2):107736. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107736. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Decision Science Can Inform Clinical Trade-Offs Regarding Cardiotoxic Cancer Treatments.决策科学可以为癌症心脏毒性治疗的临床权衡提供信息。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jun 24;5(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab053. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Systematic Reviews Should Consider Effects From Both the Population and the Individual Perspective.
系统评价应从总体和个体两个角度考虑效应。
Am J Public Health. 2021 May;111(5):820-825. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306147.
4
What's in a Label? Is Diagnosis the Start or the End of Clinical Reasoning?标签里有什么?诊断是临床推理的起点还是终点?
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):435-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3592-7. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Individual health discount rate in patients with ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎患者的个体健康贴现率。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011 Jun;17(6):1328-32. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21515. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
6
Shared decision-making based on different features of risk in the context of diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis.基于糖尿病和类风湿关节炎风险的不同特征的共同决策。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Dec;3(6):1175-80.