Roth A, Winzer T, Sander K, Anders J O, Venbrocks R-A
Department of Orthopaedics of the Rudolf-Elle Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller University of Jena, Klosterlausnitzer Strasse 81, Eisenberg, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Mar;126(2):77-81. doi: 10.1007/s00402-005-0001-9. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
Using screws for a better primary and secondary fixation has been discussed in the literature of the recent years, although the principle of press fit has been explained as the principle of a push-button. The authors wanted to compare their own results in patients using X-rays from the postoperative course to decide if it is really safer to use screws or not.
Two hundred and twenty one consecutive, not selected patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty using a cementless cup type Duraloc. They were followed up over a time of 5 years for radiological changes of the bony acetabulum around the cup ("acetabular zones" according to De Lee and Charnley). One hundred and ten cups were additionally fixed with one to three screws at the upper part in region C1, 101 cups were implanted without the use of screws.
Periprosthetic changes visible on the radiographs (immediate postoperative gaps, subsequent sclerosis and radiolucent lines) were assessed according to the time of their appearance. A gap in zone C2 was seen more often immediately after operation within the group without screws (17.8% vs. 7.3%) and disappeared within the following 25 months. Within the group with screws significantly more often a gap was found in zone C1 and C3 compared to the group without screws (7.3% vs. 1.9%). In the group with screws a sclerosis of the bone in zone C1 developed in 32.7% mostly within the first 5 months. It was followed by a radiolucent line in zone C3 in 28.2% mainly within 5-25 months postoperatively and in zone C1 in 20.9% within 16 months. Significantly less seldom were these phenomena seen at the cups without screw fixation. There was no correlation between lateral or medial positioning and deviations from the ideal inclination to the bony changes around the cups. No signs of loosening occurred in either group.
Less radiological changes around the cup if no screws were used and no disadvantages within this group led to the conclusion that an additional screw fixation in principle is not necessary in press-fit cups.
近年来,文献中已讨论了使用螺钉以实现更好的初次和二次固定,尽管压配原则已被解释为按钮原理。作者希望通过比较患者术后X线检查结果来判定使用螺钉是否真的更安全。
连续纳入221例未经过挑选的患者,使用非骨水泥型Duraloc髋臼杯进行全髋关节置换术。对他们进行了5年的随访,观察髋臼杯周围骨性髋臼的放射学变化(根据De Lee和Charnley的“髋臼区域”)。110个髋臼杯在C1区域的上部额外用1至3枚螺钉固定,101个髋臼杯植入时未使用螺钉。
根据X线片上假体周围变化(术后即刻间隙、随后的硬化和透光线)出现的时间进行评估。在未使用螺钉的组中,术后即刻C2区域出现间隙的情况更为常见(17.8%对7.3%),并在随后的25个月内消失。与未使用螺钉的组相比,使用螺钉的组中C1和C3区域出现间隙的情况明显更频繁(7.3%对1.9%)。在使用螺钉的组中,C1区域32.7%的骨出现硬化,大多在最初5个月内。随后,28.2% 的C3区域出现透光线,主要在术后5至25个月内,20.9% 的C1区域在16个月内出现透光线。在未用螺钉固定的髋臼杯中,这些现象明显少见。外侧或内侧定位与髋臼杯周围骨质变化偏离理想倾斜度之间没有相关性。两组均未出现松动迹象。
未使用螺钉时髋臼杯周围的放射学变化较少,且该组无不利情况,由此得出结论,对于压配型髋臼杯,原则上无需额外使用螺钉固定。