Ard Jamy D, Desmond Renee Ann, Allison David B, Conway Joan Marie
Nutrition Sciences and Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Mar;106(3):434-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.12.006.
Some psychological predictors of eating behaviors have been shown to affect usefulness of methods for dietary assessment. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the association of dietary restraint and disinhibition with dietary recall accuracy for total energy, fat, carbohydrate, and protein. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained from 79 male and 71 female non-Hispanic whites and African-American volunteers. Participants selected and consumed all foods for a 1-day period under observation and actual intake was determined. The following day, each participant completed a telephone 24-hour recall using the US Department of Agriculture Multiple-Pass method to obtain recalled intake. The Eating Inventory, which measures dietary restraint and disinhibition, was administered prior to eating any food in the study. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to determine if dietary restraint or disinhibition were independent predictors of recall accuracy. The mean (+/-standard deviation) age and body mass index of the participants was 43+/-12 years and 29+/-5.5 (calculated as kg/m2), respectively. On average, men overreported intake of energy by 265 kcal and women by 250 kcal; both groups also overreported intake of protein, carbohydrate, and fat. When controlling for body mass index, sex, and race, restraint was a significant independent predictor of energy intake (P=0.004) and negatively correlated with energy intake (r=-0.23, P<0.001). Unlike intake of carbohydrate or protein, fat intake was significantly and negatively associated with dietary restraint (P<0.001; r=-0.3). Dietary restraint did not affect accuracy of recall of intake of energy, fat, carbohydrate, or protein, but was significantly associated with intake of energy and fat. Disinhibition was not related to intake or accuracy. Dietetics professionals should consider dietary restraint a possible reason for a lower than expected estimate of energy intake when using 24-hour recalls.
一些饮食行为的心理预测因素已被证明会影响饮食评估方法的有效性。因此,本研究旨在确定饮食抑制和去抑制与总能量、脂肪、碳水化合物和蛋白质的饮食回忆准确性之间的关联。在一项横断面研究中,数据来自79名男性和71名女性非西班牙裔白人和非裔美国志愿者。参与者在观察期内选择并食用了一天的所有食物,并确定了实际摄入量。第二天,每位参与者使用美国农业部多轮法完成了一次24小时电话回忆,以获取回忆摄入量。在研究中食用任何食物之前,使用饮食量表测量饮食抑制和去抑制情况。采用重复测量方差分析来确定饮食抑制或去抑制是否是回忆准确性的独立预测因素。参与者的平均(±标准差)年龄和体重指数分别为43±12岁和29±5.5(以kg/m²计算)。平均而言,男性高估能量摄入量265千卡,女性高估250千卡;两组也高估了蛋白质、碳水化合物和脂肪的摄入量。在控制体重指数、性别和种族后,饮食抑制是能量摄入量的显著独立预测因素(P = 0.004),且与能量摄入量呈负相关(r = -0.23,P < 0.001)。与碳水化合物或蛋白质的摄入量不同,脂肪摄入量与饮食抑制显著负相关(P < 0.001;r = -0.3)。饮食抑制并不影响能量、脂肪、碳水化合物或蛋白质摄入量回忆的准确性,但与能量和脂肪的摄入量显著相关。去抑制与摄入量或准确性无关。营养专业人员在使用24小时回忆法时,应考虑饮食抑制可能是能量摄入量估计低于预期的一个原因。