Conway Joan M, Ingwersen Linda A, Moshfegh Alanna J
Diet and Human Performance Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultureal Research Service, MD 20705, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007.
This observational validation study was conducted under controlled conditions to test the accuracy of dietary recall in normal weight, overweight, and obese men using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method for dietary recall.
Cross-sectional analysis of actual and recalled intake of food during 1 day.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: Forty-two men ranging in age from 21 to 65 years and in body mass index from 21 to 39 kg/m(2) who lived in the metropolitan Washington DC area were studied.
The subjects selected and consumed all meals and snacks, for 1 day, from a wide variety of foods provided at a human study facility.
Actual and recalled energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat intakes were determined by direct observation and by a 24-hour dietary recall, respectively. Dietary recall was determined via telephone administration of the USDA five-step multiple-pass method the following day.
Analysis of variance and covariance tested the overall accuracy of recall and the effect of body mass index on dietary recall. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess bias in recall of food intake.
In this population of men, there were no significant differences between actual and recalled intakes of energy (3,294+/-111 and 3,541+/-124 kcal/day), protein (117+/-5 and 126+/-5 g/day), carbohydrate (414+/-16 and 449+/-16 g/day), or fat (136+/-7 and 146+/-8 g/day), respectively. Accuracy of recall was not related to body mass index in that the obese men recalled food intake as accurately as the nonobese men. The energy intake of these men was significantly correlated (r=0.57, P<.05) with their estimated energy requirements. Significant interindividual variation in accuracy of recall was found.
Under controlled conditions, the USDA five-step multiple-pass method can accurately assess intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat in a population of men regardless of their body mass index. Researchers and clinical dietitians need to continue to examine factors that influence underreporting and overreporting of food intake by the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method.
本观察性验证研究在可控条件下进行,以使用美国农业部五步多次通过法进行饮食回顾,测试正常体重、超重和肥胖男性饮食回顾的准确性。
对1天内食物的实际摄入量和回顾摄入量进行横断面分析。
研究对象/地点:研究了居住在华盛顿特区大都市区的42名男性,年龄在21至65岁之间,体重指数在21至39kg/m²之间。
受试者从人体研究设施提供的各种食物中选择并食用了1天的所有餐食和零食。
实际和回顾的能量、蛋白质、碳水化合物和脂肪摄入量分别通过直接观察和24小时饮食回顾来确定。次日通过电话采用美国农业部五步多次通过法确定饮食回顾。
方差分析和协方差分析测试了回顾的总体准确性以及体重指数对饮食回顾的影响。采用Bland-Altman图评估食物摄入量回顾中的偏差。
在这群男性中,能量(3294±111和3541±124千卡/天)、蛋白质(117±5和126±5克/天)、碳水化合物(414±16和449±16克/天)或脂肪(136±7和146±8克/天)的实际摄入量与回顾摄入量之间无显著差异。回顾的准确性与体重指数无关,因为肥胖男性与非肥胖男性一样准确地回顾了食物摄入量。这些男性的能量摄入量与其估计能量需求显著相关(r = 0.57,P <.05)。发现回顾准确性存在显著的个体间差异。
在可控条件下,美国农业部五步多次通过法可以准确评估男性群体中能量、蛋白质、碳水化合物和脂肪的摄入量,无论其体重指数如何。研究人员和临床营养师需要继续研究影响通过多次通过24小时回顾法少报和多报食物摄入量的因素。