Savage R L, Highton J, Boyd I W, Chapman P
New Zealand Pharmacovigilance Centre, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Intern Med J. 2006 Mar;36(3):162-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01035.x.
Pneumonitis has very rarely been observed in patients taking leflunomide in clinical trials. Evidence is emerging that it is more frequent in clinical practice.
The aim of this study was to investigate voluntary reports of suspected respiratory reactions to leflunomide held by the New Zealand Pharmacovigilance Centre (NZPhvC) and the Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Unit (ADRU) to ascertain if they fulfilled the criteria for pneumonitis and to define characteristics of this reaction.
Reports of respiratory adverse reactions attributed to leflunomide and received by the NZPhvC and the ADRU were analysed to identify those that were likely to be pneumonitis based on the criteria of Searles and McKendry. Features of these reports were examined to provide further information about this adverse reaction.
The NZPhvC and the ADRU received 14 reports considered to be pneumonitis occurring in patients taking leflunomide. Two case reports fulfilled the Searles and McKendry criteria for definite or probable hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The patients in the remaining reports had radiological evidence of pulmonary infiltrates, an acute respiratory illness and no evidence of precipitating infection. In two cases the patients were taking leflunomide alone; one improved when it was withdrawn. In the other 12 cases, patients were taking leflunomide in combination with methotrexate. In nine of these 12 patients pneumonitis occurred after leflunomide was added to methotrexate, usually within 12-20 weeks. One of the two patients who died had possible previous methotrexate pneumonitis. Leflunomide washout with cholestyramine was used to treat three patients, one with life-threatening illness, with good results.
This case series supports observations that leflunomide can cause pneumonitis either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate. The case histories indicate that prompt recognition is important to avoid life-threatening disease and support the use of cholestyramine to remove leflunomide.
在临床试验中,服用来氟米特的患者极少出现肺炎。有证据表明,在临床实践中这种情况更为常见。
本研究旨在调查新西兰药物警戒中心(NZPhvC)和澳大利亚药物不良反应监测部门(ADRU)收到的关于来氟米特疑似呼吸道反应的自愿报告,以确定这些报告是否符合肺炎标准,并明确该反应的特征。
对NZPhvC和ADRU收到的归因于来氟米特的呼吸道不良反应报告进行分析,根据Searles和McKendry的标准确定可能为肺炎的报告。检查这些报告的特征,以提供有关这种不良反应的更多信息。
NZPhvC和ADRU收到14份被认为是服用来氟米特的患者发生肺炎的报告。两份病例报告符合Searles和McKendry关于明确或可能的过敏性肺炎的标准。其余报告中的患者有肺部浸润的放射学证据、急性呼吸道疾病且无感染诱因证据。2例患者仅服用来氟米特;1例停药后病情改善。在其他12例中,患者同时服用来氟米特和甲氨蝶呤。在这12例患者中的9例中,在甲氨蝶呤基础上加用来氟米特后发生肺炎,通常在12 - 20周内。死亡的2例患者中有1例可能既往有甲氨蝶呤肺炎。3例患者使用考来烯胺进行来氟米特洗脱治疗,其中1例病情危及生命,治疗效果良好。
该病例系列支持以下观察结果,即来氟米特单药治疗或与甲氨蝶呤联合使用均可导致肺炎。病例记录表明,及时识别对于避免危及生命的疾病很重要,并支持使用考来烯胺清除来氟米特。