Wraight P R, Lawrence S M, Campbell D A, Colman P G
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2006 Mar;36(3):197-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01039.x.
Admission rates for diabetes-related foot complications to an Australian hospital were assessed by comparing the frequently used method of retrospectively identifying patients according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes with that of prospectively identifying patients at the time of admission. The aim was to determine the true admission rate of diabetes-related foot complications and to assess the ability of ICD discharge codes to accurately represent the clinical severity of each identified admission. The retrospective study of ICD codes identified approximately one-third of the patients admitted during the prospective studies. Furthermore, ICD codes allocated in the prospective studies failed to accurately represent the clinical condition in 61% of cases and the corresponding Weighted Inlier Equivalent Separations weighting resulted in a $215,000/year deficit for admissions to a single hospital.
通过比较澳大利亚一家医院常用的根据国际疾病分类(ICD)编码回顾性识别患者的方法与入院时前瞻性识别患者的方法,评估了糖尿病相关足部并发症的入院率。目的是确定糖尿病相关足部并发症的真实入院率,并评估ICD出院编码准确反映每个确诊入院病例临床严重程度的能力。对ICD编码的回顾性研究识别出了前瞻性研究期间入院患者的约三分之一。此外,前瞻性研究中分配的ICD编码在61%的病例中未能准确反映临床状况,相应的加权内点等效分离加权导致一家医院的入院治疗每年出现21.5万美元的亏空。