Blair Silvia, Carmona-Fonseca Jaime, Piñeros Juan G, Ríos Alexandra, Alvarez Tania, Alvarez Gonzalo, Tobón Alberto
Laboratorio 610, Grupo Malaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Malar J. 2006 Feb 20;5:14. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-14.
Evaluate the frequency of failure of eight treatments for non-complicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum in patients from Turbo (Urabá region), El Bagre and Zaragoza (Bajo Cauca region), applying the 1998 protocol of the World Health Organization (WHO). Monotherapies using chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AQ), mefloquine (MQ) and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), and combinations using chloroquine-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (CQ-SP), amodiaquine-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQ-SP), mefloquine-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (MQ-SP) and artesunate-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS-SP), were examined.
A balanced experimental design with eight groups. Samples were selected based on statistical and epidemiological criteria. Patients were followed for 21 to 28 days, including seven or eight parasitological and clinical evaluations, with an active search for defaulting patients. A non-blinded evaluation of the antimalarial treatment response (early failure, late failure, adequate response) was performed.
Initially, the loss of patients to follow-up was higher than 40%, but the immediate active search for the cases and the monetary help for transportation expenses of patients, reduced the loss to 6%. The treatment failure was: CQ 82%, AQ 30%, MQ 4%, SP 24%, CQ-SP 17%, AQ-SP 2%, MQ-S-P 0%, AS-SP 3%.
The characteristics of an optimal epidemiological monitoring system of antimalarial treatment response in Colombia are discussed. It is proposed to focus this on early failure detection, by applying a screening test every two to three years, based on a seven to 14-day follow-up. Clinical and parasitological assessment would be carried out by a general physician and a field microscopist from the local hospital, with active measures to search for defaulter patients at follow-up.
采用世界卫生组织(WHO)1998年的方案,评估在图尔博(乌拉瓦地区)、埃尔巴格雷和萨拉戈萨(考卡山谷地区)的患者中,针对由恶性疟原虫引起的非复杂性疟疾的八种治疗方法的失败频率。研究了使用氯喹(CQ)、阿莫地喹(AQ)、甲氟喹(MQ)和磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP)的单一疗法,以及使用氯喹-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(CQ-SP)、阿莫地喹-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(AQ-SP)、甲氟喹-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(MQ-SP)和青蒿琥酯-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(AS-SP)的联合疗法。
采用八组均衡的实验设计。根据统计和流行病学标准选择样本。对患者进行21至28天的随访,包括七或八次寄生虫学和临床评估,并积极寻找失访患者。对抗疟治疗反应(早期失败、晚期失败、充分反应)进行非盲评估。
最初,失访患者的比例高于40%,但立即积极寻找病例以及为患者提供交通费用的经济援助,使失访率降至6%。治疗失败率分别为:CQ 82%,AQ 30%,MQ 4%,SP 24%,CQ-SP 17%,AQ-SP 2%,MQ-S-P 0%,AS-SP 3%。
讨论了哥伦比亚抗疟治疗反应最佳流行病学监测系统的特点。建议将重点放在早期失败检测上,每两到三年进行一次筛查试验,基于七到十四天的随访。临床和寄生虫学评估将由当地医院的全科医生和现场显微镜检查人员进行,并在随访时采取积极措施寻找失访患者。