Salunke Pravin, Behari Sanjay, Kirankumar Markani V, Sharma Manish S, Jaiswal Awadesh K, Jain Vijendra K
Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Feb;104(2 Suppl):115-22. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.2.115.
Clinicoradiological differences and outcome following surgery in pediatric patients (< or = 16 years of age) with congenital irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (RAAD) were analyzed.
Ninety-six patients (57 with IAAD and 39 with RAAD) were categorized as follows: Grade I, no deficits except hyperreflexia or neck pain (six patients); Grade II, minor deficits but independent for activities of daily living (25); Grade III, partially dependent (30); and Grade IV, totally dependent (35). Patients with RAAD underwent direct posterior fusion, and those with IAAD were treated with transoral decompression and posterior fusion. Patients with good outcomes included those who could walk unaided, with improvement in spasticity and weakness, and those who maintained Grade I status. The category of poor outcome included patients with the following conditions: postoperative deterioration or lack of improvement; inability to ambulate regardless of neurological improvement at a minimum follow-up duration of 3 months; or perioperative death. A significantly higher incidence of C-1 assimilation, C2-3 fusion, asymmetrical occiput-C2 facet joints, and basilar invagination were seen in patients with IAAD, and os odontoideum was noted in those with RAAD (p < 0.05). A good outcome was recorded in 35 patients with IAAD and 22 with RAAD, whereas 14 with IAAD and nine with RAAD had a poor outcome (eight patients in each category were lost to follow up).
Radiological differences in the anatomy of patients with IAAD and those with RAAD may be due to improper segmentation of the occipital and upper cervical sclerotomes in the former and dysfunction of the transverse ligament in the latter. A significantly better outcome was noted in completely dependent patients with IAAD compared with those with RAAD. Respiratory compromise was an important prognostic factor.
分析先天性不可复位寰枢椎脱位(IAAD)和可复位寰枢椎脱位(RAAD)的儿科患者(≤16岁)手术治疗后的临床放射学差异及预后。
96例患者(57例IAAD和39例RAAD)分为以下几类:I级,除反射亢进或颈部疼痛外无神经功能缺损(6例患者);II级,轻度神经功能缺损但日常生活自理(25例);III级,部分依赖(30例);IV级,完全依赖(35例)。RAAD患者行直接后路融合术,IAAD患者行经口减压和后路融合术。预后良好的患者包括能够独立行走、痉挛和肌无力有所改善以及维持I级状态的患者。预后不良的类别包括以下情况的患者:术后病情恶化或无改善;在至少3个月的最短随访期内,无论神经功能是否改善均无法行走;或围手术期死亡。IAAD患者中C-1同化、C2-3融合、枕骨-C2关节不对称和基底凹陷的发生率明显更高,而RAAD患者中可见齿状突骨(p<0.05)。57例IAAD患者中有35例预后良好,39例RAAD患者中有22例预后良好,而14例IAAD患者和9例RAAD患者预后不良(每类各有8例患者失访)。
IAAD患者和RAAD患者解剖结构的放射学差异可能是由于前者枕骨和上颈椎骨节段划分不当,后者横韧带功能障碍所致。与RAAD患者相比,完全依赖的IAAD患者预后明显更好。呼吸功能不全是一个重要的预后因素。