Caldwell Brent, Aldington Sarah, Weatherall Mark, Shirtcliffe Philippa, Beasley Richard
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):132-40. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900315.
To examine whether the increased risk of cardiovascular events with rofecoxib represents a class effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) specific inhibitors.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind clinical trials of celecoxib of at least 6 weeks' duration and presented data on serious cardiovascular thromboembolic events. Data sources included six bibliographic databases, the relevant files of the United States Food and Drug Administration, and pharmaceutical company websites.
Pooled fixed effects estimates of the odds ratios for risk of cardiovascular events with celecoxib compared with comparator treatment were calculated using the inverse variance weight method. The main outcome measure was myocardial infarction.
Four placebo-controlled trials with 4422 patients were included in the primary meta-analysis comparing celecoxib with placebo. The odds ratio of myocardial infarction with celecoxib compared to placebo was 2.26 (95%confidence interval 1.0 to 5.1). For composite cardiovascular events [odd ratio 1.38 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.10)], cardiovascular deaths [OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.38 to 2.95)] and stroke [OR 1.0(95% CI 0.51 to 1.84)] there was no significant increase in risk with celecoxib. The secondary meta-analysis which included a total of six studies (with placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and paracetamol as comparators) of 12 780 patients, showed similar findings with a significant increased risk with celecoxib for myocardial infarction [OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.15 to 3.08)] but not other outcome measures.
The available data indicate an increased risk of myocardial infarction with celecoxib therapy, consistent with a class effect for COX-2 specific inhibitors.
探讨罗非昔布导致心血管事件风险增加是否代表环氧化酶-2(COX-2)特异性抑制剂的类效应。
对塞来昔布至少为期6周的随机双盲临床试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并提供严重心血管血栓栓塞事件的数据。数据来源包括六个文献数据库、美国食品药品监督管理局的相关文件以及制药公司网站。
采用逆方差加权法计算塞来昔布与对照治疗相比发生心血管事件风险的比值比的合并固定效应估计值。主要观察指标为心肌梗死。
在将塞来昔布与安慰剂进行比较的主要荟萃分析中纳入了4项安慰剂对照试验,共4422例患者。与安慰剂相比,塞来昔布导致心肌梗死的比值比为2.26(95%置信区间1.0至5.1)。对于复合心血管事件[比值比1.38(95%置信区间0.91至2.10)]、心血管死亡[比值比1.06(95%置信区间0.38至2.95)]和中风[比值比1.0(95%置信区间0.51至1.84)],塞来昔布并未使风险显著增加。纳入总共6项研究(以安慰剂、双氯芬酸、布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚作为对照)、共12780例患者的二次荟萃分析显示了类似的结果,即塞来昔布导致心肌梗死的风险显著增加[比值比1.88(95%置信区间1.15至3.08)],但其他观察指标未见此情况。
现有数据表明塞来昔布治疗会增加心肌梗死风险,这与COX-2特异性抑制剂的类效应一致。