Ong Bie Nio, Hooper Helen
Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University.
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Mar;28(2):203-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00488.x.
This paper builds on the body of knowledge concerning clinician-patient relationships, patient-centred care and concordance. It extends the analysis to directly comparing patient and professional accounts of diagnosis, treatment and outcomes over time. Comparisons will be made between lay and clinical perspectives, but also between different professional approaches and patients' assessment of those differences. The paper is based upon an in-depth qualitative analysis of two case studies: first, one patient who established concordant relationships with the health professionals who treated her back pain; second, one patient who had both concordant and discordant relationships with health professionals. The issues explored centre on the determinants of concordant/discordant therapeutic relationships and whether greater attention given to the meaning of illness leads to improved care.
本文建立在有关临床医生与患者关系、以患者为中心的护理以及一致性的知识体系之上。它将分析扩展到直接比较患者和专业人员对诊断、治疗及随时间推移的结果的描述。不仅会在非专业和临床视角之间进行比较,还会在不同的专业方法以及患者对这些差异的评估之间进行比较。本文基于对两个案例研究的深入定性分析:其一,一名与治疗她背痛的健康专业人员建立了一致性关系的患者;其二,一名与健康专业人员既有一致性关系又有不一致性关系的患者。所探讨的问题集中在一致性/不一致性治疗关系的决定因素,以及对疾病意义给予更多关注是否会带来更好的护理。