Suppr超能文献

严重受伤婴儿中虐待儿童诊断的差异。

Variation in the diagnosis of child abuse in severely injured infants.

作者信息

Trokel Matthew, Waddimba Anthony, Griffith John, Sege Robert

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):722-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2731.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of child abuse is difficult and may reflect patient, practitioner, and system factors. Previous studies have demonstrated potential lethal consequences if cases of abuse are missed and suggested a role for continuing medical education in improving the accuracy of diagnosis of suspected abuse. Although the majority of injured American children are treated at general hospitals, most published studies of severe injury resulting from child abuse have been conducted at children's hospitals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of hospital type in observed variations in the frequency of diagnosis of child physical abuse among children with high-risk injuries.

METHODS

Hospital discharge data were evaluated, and adjusted rates of abuse diagnosis were reported according to hospital type. A regression model estimated the number of cases of abuse that would have been diagnosed if all hospitals identified abuse as frequently as observed at pediatric specialty hospitals. This study consisted of children who were <1 year old and admitted to US hospitals in 1997 for treatment of traumatic brain injury or femur fracture, excluding penetrating trauma or motor-vehicle-related injury. A total of 2253 weighted cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with a medical diagnosis of child abuse varied widely between hospital types: 29% of the cases were diagnosed as abuse at children's hospitals compared with 13% at general hospitals. An estimated 178 infants (39% of total) with these specific injuries would have been identified as abused had they been treated at children's rather than general hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital type was associated with large variations in the frequency of diagnosis of child abuse. This variation was not related to observed differences in the patients or their injuries and may result from systematic underdiagnosis in general hospitals. This result has implications for quality-improvement programs at general hospitals, where the majority of injured children in the United States receive emergent medical care.

摘要

目的

虐待儿童的诊断较为困难,可能反映出患者、从业者及系统等多方面因素。既往研究表明,若漏诊虐待儿童的病例可能会导致潜在的致命后果,并提示持续医学教育在提高疑似虐待诊断准确性方面可发挥作用。尽管大多数受伤的美国儿童在综合医院接受治疗,但大多数已发表的关于虐待儿童所致重伤的研究是在儿童医院进行的。本研究的目的是评估医院类型在高危受伤儿童中观察到的身体虐待诊断频率差异中所起的作用。

方法

对医院出院数据进行评估,并根据医院类型报告虐待诊断的校正率。采用回归模型估计,如果所有医院诊断虐待的频率都与儿科专科医院观察到的一样高,那么可能被诊断为虐待的病例数。本研究纳入了1997年在美国医院因创伤性脑损伤或股骨骨折入院治疗的1岁以下儿童,但不包括穿透性创伤或与机动车相关的损伤。共分析了2253例加权病例。

结果

不同医院类型中,被诊断为虐待儿童的患者比例差异很大:儿童医院中有29%的病例被诊断为虐待,而综合医院中这一比例为13%。估计如果这些特定受伤的婴儿在儿童医院而非综合医院接受治疗,178例(占总数的39%)会被认定为受虐。

结论

医院类型与虐待儿童诊断频率的巨大差异有关。这种差异与观察到的患者及其损伤方面的差异无关,可能是由于综合医院存在系统性的诊断不足所致。这一结果对综合医院的质量改进项目具有启示意义,因为美国大多数受伤儿童在综合医院接受急诊医疗服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验