Walters Glenn D
Federal Correctional Institution-Schuylkill, Minersville, Pennsylvania 17954-0700, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Apr;50(2):166-73. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05281129.
The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) was administered to program participants in two different federal prisons-a medium-security federal correctional institution and a maximum-security penitentiary-who were subsequently followed for a period of 24 months for evidence of disciplinary adjustment problems. Disciplinary outcome was measured by the total number of incident reports, the number of nonaggressive incident reports, and the number of aggressive incident reports received during the 24-month follow-up. Negative binomial regression was used to test the relationship between the eight PICTS thinking style scales and three disciplinary outcome measures because the total and nonaggressive disciplinary report distributions showed signs of overdispersion. The only PICTS thinking style scale to achieve statistical significance in this study was the Cutoff scale that successfully predicted total, nonaggressive, and aggressive incident reports in both samples.
研究人员对两所不同联邦监狱的项目参与者进行了“犯罪思维方式心理量表”(PICTS)测试,这两所监狱分别是一所中度安全级别的联邦惩教机构和一所高度安全级别的监狱。随后,对这些参与者进行了为期24个月的跟踪,以寻找纪律调整问题的证据。纪律结果通过事件报告总数、非攻击性事件报告数量以及在24个月随访期间收到的攻击性事件报告数量来衡量。由于总的和非攻击性纪律报告分布显示出过度分散的迹象,因此使用负二项回归来检验PICTS的八个思维方式量表与三种纪律结果测量之间的关系。在本研究中唯一达到统计学显著性的PICTS思维方式量表是临界量表,它成功地预测了两个样本中的事件报告总数、非攻击性事件报告和攻击性事件报告。