Stacey Paula C, Fortnum Heather M, Barton Garry R, Summerfield A Quentin
MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ear Hear. 2006 Apr;27(2):161-86. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202353.37567.b4.
The objectives of this study were to identify variables that are associated with differences in outcome among hearing-impaired children and to control those variables while assessing the impact of cochlear implantation.
In a cross-sectional study, the parents and teachers of a representative sample of hearing-impaired children were invited to complete questionnaires about children's auditory performance, spoken communication skills, educational achievements, and quality of life. Multiple regression was used to measure the strength of association between these outcomes and variables related to the child (average hearing level, age at onset of hearing impairment, age, gender, number of additional disabilities), the family (parental occupational skill level, ethnicity, and parental hearing status), and cochlear implantation.
Questionnaires were returned by the parents of 2858 children, 468 of whom had received a cochlear implant, and by the teachers of 2241 children, 383 of whom had received an implant. Across all domains, reported outcomes were better for children with fewer disabilities in addition to impaired hearing. Across most domains, reported outcomes were better for children who were older, female, with a more favorable average hearing level, with a higher parental occupational skill level, and with an onset of hearing-impairment after 3 years. When these variables were controlled, cochlear implantation was consistently associated with advantages in auditory performance and spoken communication skills, but less consistently associated with advantages in educational achievements and quality of life. Significant associations were found most commonly for children who were younger than 5 years when implanted, and had used implants for more than 4 years. These children, whose mean (preoperative, unaided) average hearing level was 118 dB, were reported to perform at the same level as nonimplanted children with average hearing levels in the range from 80 dB to 104 dB, depending on the outcome measure.
When rigorous statistical control is exercised in comparing implanted and nonimplanted children, pediatric cochlear implantation is associated with reported improvements both in spoken communication skills and in some aspects of educational achievements and quality of life, provided that children receive implants before 5 years of age.
本研究的目的是确定与听力受损儿童结局差异相关的变量,并在评估人工耳蜗植入的影响时对这些变量进行控制。
在一项横断面研究中,邀请了具有代表性的听力受损儿童样本的家长和教师填写有关儿童听觉表现、口语交流技能、学业成绩和生活质量的问卷。多元回归用于衡量这些结局与与儿童相关的变量(平均听力水平、听力障碍 onset 年龄、年龄、性别、其他残疾数量)、家庭(父母职业技能水平、种族和父母听力状况)以及人工耳蜗植入之间的关联强度。
2858名儿童的家长返回了问卷,其中468名接受了人工耳蜗植入;2241名儿童的教师返回了问卷,其中383名接受了植入。在所有领域,除听力受损外残疾较少的儿童报告的结局更好。在大多数领域,年龄较大、女性、平均听力水平更有利、父母职业技能水平较高且听力障碍 onset 在3岁之后的儿童报告的结局更好。当控制这些变量时,人工耳蜗植入始终与听觉表现和口语交流技能方面的优势相关,但与学业成绩和生活质量方面的优势相关性较弱。对于植入时年龄小于5岁且使用植入物超过4年的儿童,最常发现显著关联。据报告,这些平均(术前,未辅助)平均听力水平为118 dB的儿童,根据结局指标,其表现与平均听力水平在80 dB至104 dB范围内的未植入儿童相同。
在比较植入和未植入儿童时进行严格的统计控制,小儿人工耳蜗植入与报告的口语交流技能以及学业成绩和生活质量的某些方面的改善相关,前提是儿童在5岁之前接受植入。