Mishra Yugal K, Khanna Surendra N, Wasir Harpreet, Sharma K K, Mehta Yatin, Trehan Naresh
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi.
Indian Heart J. 2005 Nov-Dec;57(6):688-93.
Recent advances in minimally invasive technology has expanded the application of the right thoracotomy approach for mitral valve surgery and atrial septal defect closure. The present study examines the feasibility, safety and efficacy of this technique.
Between September 1997 and December 2004, 430 patients underwent mitral valve surgery through right anterolateral thoracotomy. The mitral valve was repaired in 62 patients, and 368 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. During same period, 336 patients underwent surgical closure of atrial septal defect. In all cases femoral artery and femoral venous cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no approach-related limitation to surgical exposure, nor complication in cannulation of femoral vessels through the groin. Mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time was 90 +/- 48 min and 51 +/- 29 min, respectively. Mean intubation time was 14.8 hours (range: 8-28 hours). Mean duration of intensive care andhospital stay was 26 hours (range: 18-38 hours) and 7 days (range: 5-17 days), respectively. In the atrial septal defect group, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time was 29 +/- 14 min and 19 +/- 8 min, respectively. Mean intensive care unit stay and mean hospital stay was 9.8 +/- 2.6 hours and 4.0 +/- 1.9 days, respectively. Hospital mortality was 0.46% (2/430) in the mitral valve group while there was no hospital mortality in atrial septal defect group. At a mean follow-up of 38.0 +/- 6.2 months there was one late death and two re-operations in the patients who underwent mitral valve surgery.
Port-access approach is safe, offers faster recovery, cosmetic advantage, more patient satisfaction: it obviates the complications due to re-entry in redo cases and offers same efficacy as conventional operation. Furthermore, it is an excellent approach for mitral valve surgery in patients who had previous cardiac procedures. It has become our standard approach for repair of atrial septal defect and isolated mitral valve procedures.
微创技术的最新进展扩大了右胸切口在二尖瓣手术和房间隔缺损封堵术中的应用。本研究探讨了该技术的可行性、安全性和有效性。
1997年9月至2004年12月期间,430例患者通过右前外侧胸壁切口接受二尖瓣手术。62例患者行二尖瓣修复术,368例患者行二尖瓣置换术。同期,336例患者接受房间隔缺损手术闭合。所有病例均采用股动脉和股静脉插管进行体外循环。手术暴露无入路相关限制,经腹股沟股血管插管也无并发症。体外循环平均持续时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为90±48分钟和51±29分钟。平均插管时间为14.8小时(范围:8 - 28小时)。重症监护平均持续时间和住院时间分别为26小时(范围:18 - 38小时)和7天(范围:5 - 17天)。在房间隔缺损组,体外循环平均时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为29±14分钟和19±8分钟。重症监护病房平均住院时间和平均住院时间分别为9.8±2.6小时和4.0±1.9天。二尖瓣组医院死亡率为0.46%(2/430),而房间隔缺损组无医院死亡病例。二尖瓣手术患者平均随访38.0±6.2个月时,有1例晚期死亡和2例再次手术。
端口入路方法安全,恢复快,具有美容优势,患者满意度更高:它避免了再次手术病例中再次进入引起的并发症,且与传统手术效果相同。此外,对于既往有心脏手术史的患者,它是二尖瓣手术的一种极佳方法。它已成为我们修复房间隔缺损和单纯二尖瓣手术的标准方法。