Syre H, Valvatne H, Sandven P, Grewal H M S
Section of Microbiology and Immunology, The Gade Institute, University of Bergen and Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 May;57(5):987-91. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl054. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
To evaluate the inexpensive colorimetric nitrate reductase-based antibiotic susceptibility (CONRAS) assay for testing the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to streptomycin and ethambutol in liquid cultures, and to compare the CONRAS test with the manual mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) test, using the radiometric BACTEC 460TB method as reference.
A total of 89 M. tuberculosis isolates were tested for susceptibility to streptomycin and ethambutol using the CONRAS and manual MGIT methods and the results were compared with BACTEC 460TB. Isolates with discrepant results between the CONRAS test and BACTEC 460TB were analysed using the agar proportion method, Etest and mutation analysis of genes involved in resistance to streptomycin and ethambutol.
The agreement between the CONRAS test and BACTEC 460TB was 88% for streptomycin and 84% for ethambutol. The corresponding agreement of the manual MGIT test with BACTEC 460TB was 89 and 80%, respectively. There was good agreement for streptomycin and moderate agreement for ethambutol between the CONRAS and manual MGIT tests on one hand and BACTEC 460TB on the other (CONRAS test, kappa(streptomycin) 0.74 and kappa(ethambutol) 0.59, P < 0.001; manual MGIT test, kappa(streptomycin) 0.77 and kappa(ethambutol) 0.50, P < 0.001).
There is good agreement for the two non-radiometric liquid culture methods (CONRAS and manual MGIT) compared with BACTEC 460TB for the detection of streptomycin resistance. Further standardization is needed for testing of ethambutol resistance using the CONRAS and manual MGIT assays.
评估基于比色法硝酸还原酶的廉价抗生素敏感性(CONRAS)检测方法,以检测液体培养物中结核分枝杆菌对链霉素和乙胺丁醇的敏感性,并将CONRAS检测与手工分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)检测进行比较,以放射性BACTEC 460TB方法作为参考。
使用CONRAS和手工MGIT方法对总共89株结核分枝杆菌分离株进行链霉素和乙胺丁醇敏感性检测,并将结果与BACTEC 460TB进行比较。对CONRAS检测和BACTEC 460TB结果不一致的分离株,采用琼脂比例法、Etest以及对链霉素和乙胺丁醇耐药相关基因进行突变分析。
CONRAS检测与BACTEC 460TB对链霉素的一致性为88%,对乙胺丁醇的一致性为84%。手工MGIT检测与BACTEC 460TB对链霉素和乙胺丁醇的相应一致性分别为89%和80%。一方面,CONRAS检测和手工MGIT检测与BACTEC 460TB对链霉素的一致性良好,对乙胺丁醇的一致性中等(CONRAS检测,链霉素的kappa值为0.74,乙胺丁醇的kappa值为0.59,P<0.001;手工MGIT检测,链霉素的kappa值为o.77,乙胺丁醇的kappa值为0.50,P<0.001)。
与BACTEC 460TB相比,两种非放射性液体培养方法(CONRAS和手工MGIT)在检测链霉素耐药性方面一致性良好。使用CONRAS和手工MGIT检测法检测乙胺丁醇耐药性需要进一步标准化。