Suppr超能文献

用于结核分枝杆菌药敏试验的自动BACTEC 960系统的多中心评估

Multicentre evaluation of an automated BACTEC 960 system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

作者信息

Giampaglia C M S, Martins M C, Vieira G B de Oliveira, Vinhas S A, Telles M A da Silva, Palaci M, Marsico A G, Hadad D J, Mello F C Q, Fonseca L de Souza, Kritski A

机构信息

Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Sep;11(9):986-91.

Abstract

SETTING

Three mycobacteria reference laboratories in the south-eastern part of Brazil.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the automated Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

DESIGN

Performance of the automated BACTEC MGIT 960 (M960) system for testing M. tuberculosis susceptibility to streptomycin (SM), isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP) and ethambutol (EMB) was evaluated with 95 clinical isolates and compared to the results of the radiometric BACTEC 460TB (B460) system, the proportion method (PM), and the resistance ratio method (RRM). Judicial susceptibility profiles of 88 isolates were defined based on two or more concordant results among B460, PM and RRM, and used as a reference for comparison with M960 results.

RESULTS

Agreement rates between M960 and conventional methods were 95.2% with B460, 96.6% with the PM and 93.4% with the RRM. The lowest agreement rates were obtained for SM with the RRM and for EMB with B460. When comparing M960 with judicial susceptibility profiles, the agreement rate was 97.9%. The agreement rates obtained for INH and RMP were 99.2% and for SM and EMB they were 96.2% and 96.9%, respectively. The mean time to reporting the M960 results was 6.9 days.

CONCLUSION

M960 offers great improvements when compared to the proportion and resistance ratio methods and would benefit patient treatment.

摘要

背景

巴西东南部的三个分枝杆菌参考实验室。

目的

评估自动分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)用于结核分枝杆菌药敏试验的效果。

设计

使用95株临床分离株评估自动BACTEC MGIT 960(M960)系统检测结核分枝杆菌对链霉素(SM)、异烟肼(INH)、利福平(RMP)和乙胺丁醇(EMB)敏感性的性能,并与放射性BACTEC 460TB(B460)系统、比例法(PM)和耐药率法(RRM)的结果进行比较。基于B460、PM和RRM中两个或更多一致结果定义了88株分离株的判定药敏谱,并用作与M960结果比较的参考。

结果

M960与传统方法之间的符合率,与B460为95.2%,与PM为96.6%,与RRM为93.4%。与RRM的SM以及与B460的EMB的符合率最低。将M960与判定药敏谱进行比较时,符合率为97.9%。INH和RMP的符合率分别为99.2%,SM和EMB的符合率分别为96.2%和96.9%。报告M960结果的平均时间为6.9天。

结论

与比例法和耐药率法相比,M960有很大改进,将有利于患者治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验