Biotech patents: looking backward while moving forward.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Eisenberg Rebecca S

机构信息

University of Michigan Law School, 407 Hutchins Hall, 625 South State Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1215, USA.

出版信息

Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):317-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-317.

DOI:10.1038/nbt0306-317

PMID:16525404

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Biotech patents: looking backward while moving forward.

Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):317-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-317.

Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.

Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;25(3):264-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt0307-264. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):1105-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt1007-1105.

US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;20(7):639. doi: 10.1038/nbt0702-639a.

Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.

Science. 2009 Jun 12;324(5933):1374. doi: 10.1126/science.324_1374.

US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2001 May;19(5):394. doi: 10.1038/88008.

Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.

Science. 2011 Apr 8;332(6026):163. doi: 10.1126/science.332.6026.163.

Intellectual property. Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules.

Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):14-5. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6192.14.

Intellectual property. Supreme Court rules out patents on 'natural' genes.

Science. 2013 Jun 21;340(6139):1387-8. doi: 10.1126/science.340.6139.1387.

Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.

Univ N S W Law J. 2003;26(3):782-92.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Biotech patents: looking backward while moving forward.

Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):317-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-317.

Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.

Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;25(3):264-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt0307-264. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):1105-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt1007-1105.

US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;20(7):639. doi: 10.1038/nbt0702-639a.

Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.

Science. 2009 Jun 12;324(5933):1374. doi: 10.1126/science.324_1374.

US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents.

Nat Biotechnol. 2001 May;19(5):394. doi: 10.1038/88008.

Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.

Science. 2011 Apr 8;332(6026):163. doi: 10.1126/science.332.6026.163.

Intellectual property. Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules.

Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):14-5. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6192.14.

Intellectual property. Supreme Court rules out patents on 'natural' genes.

Science. 2013 Jun 21;340(6139):1387-8. doi: 10.1126/science.340.6139.1387.

Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.

Univ N S W Law J. 2003;26(3):782-92.