Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.
作者信息
Marshall Eliot
出版信息
Science. 2011 Apr 8;332(6026):163. doi: 10.1126/science.332.6026.163.
PMID:21474725
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Patents. Signature on visitor's form fuels Stanford v. Roche court battle.专利。访客表格上的签名引发斯坦福大学与罗氏公司的法庭之争。
Science. 2011 Apr 8;332(6026):163. doi: 10.1126/science.332.6026.163.
2
US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.美国最高法院对专利施加严格限制。
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;20(7):639. doi: 10.1038/nbt0702-639a.
3
Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.专利。美国最高法院深入探究可专利性的范围。
Science. 2009 Jun 12;324(5933):1374. doi: 10.1126/science.324_1374.
4
Supreme Court ruling prompts universities to tighten employee contracts.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Aug 5;29(8):678. doi: 10.1038/nbt0811-678.
5
Bayh-Dole: if we knew then what we know now.拜杜法案：要是我们当时就知道现在所知道的情况就好了。
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):320-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-320.
6
Obviousness, hindsight and perspective: the impact of KSR v. Teleflex on biotech and pharmaceutical patents.显而易见性、后见之明与视角：凯斯诉泰利福案对生物技术和制药专利的影响
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):1105-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt1007-1105.
7
Supreme Court boosts licensees in biotech patent battles.最高法院在生物技术专利纠纷中支持被许可方。
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;25(3):264-5. doi: 10.1038/nbt0307-264. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
8
Research interactions between industry and academia: a corporate perspective.产业界与学术界之间的研究互动：企业视角。
Physiologist. 1996 Jun;39(3):81, 90-2.
9
Biotech patents: looking backward while moving forward.
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):317-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-317.
10
Supreme Court decision on patent for HIV test unlikely to set major precedent.最高法院关于艾滋病病毒检测专利的裁决不太可能开创重大先例。
Nat Med. 2011 Jul 7;17(7):758. doi: 10.1038/nm0711-758b.
Zotero 插件