• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同粘结系统与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度

Microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin.

作者信息

Soares Fabio Zovico Maxnuck, Rocha Rachel de Oliveira, Raggio Daniela Prócida, Sadek Fernanda Tranchesi, Cardoso Paulo Eduardo Capel

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;27(6):457-62.

PMID:16532885
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this in vitro study were to: (1) compare bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin using microtensile test; and (2) evaluate the interaction of these materials to primary and permanent dentin by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

METHODS

Middle-coronal dentin surfaces of 18 exfoliated primary and 18 extracted permanent molars were exposed and teeth were randomly divided, according to their adhesive system, into 3 groups (N=6 per group): (1) Clearfil SE Bond (SE); (2) One Up Bond F (OU); and (3) Single Bond (SB). Then, 5-mm high composite blocks were constructed. After bonding procedures, the teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours prior to the specimens' preparation. For the microtensile test, teeth (N=5 per group) were longitudinally sectioned into 2 axes rendering beam-specimens that were glued to special devices, which were mounted in a Universal Testing Machine to be loaded under a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture. One tooth of each group was prepared for SEM.

RESULTS

Microtensile bond strength mean values (MPa) to primary/permanent dentin were: (1) SE=60.0/61.4; (2) OU=54.5/53.3; and (3) SB=70.1/64.9. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant differences (P>.05) for the bond strength values among primary and permanent dentin groups, neither among groups SExSB and SExOU. SEM images of SE and SB showed a well-defined, uniform, and continuous hybrid layer. A continuous hybrid layer, however, was not found for OU.

CONCLUSIONS

Bond strength and micromorphologic characteristics of the adhesive systems evaluated were not influenced by the substrate. OU achieved worse results.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的目的是:(1)使用微拉伸试验比较不同粘结系统与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的粘结强度;(2)通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估这些材料与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的相互作用。

方法

暴露18颗脱落乳牙和18颗拔除恒牙的中冠部牙本质表面,根据粘结系统将牙齿随机分为3组(每组n = 6):(1)Clearfil SE Bond(SE);(2)One Up Bond F(OU);(3)Single Bond(SB)。然后,构建5毫米高的复合树脂块。粘结程序完成后,在制备标本前,将牙齿在37℃蒸馏水中保存24小时。对于微拉伸试验,将牙齿(每组n = 5)纵向切成两个轴,制成梁状标本,粘贴到特殊装置上,安装在万能试验机上,以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度加载直至断裂。每组制备一颗牙齿用于SEM观察。

结果

与乳牙/恒牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度平均值(MPa)为:(1)SE = 60.0/61.4;(2)OU = 54.5/53.3;(3)SB = 70.1/64.9。双向方差分析(ANOVA)显示,乳牙和恒牙牙本质组之间的粘结强度值以及SE×SB组和SE×OU组之间均无显著差异(P>0. .05)。SE和SB的SEM图像显示出清晰、均匀且连续的混合层。然而,未发现OU有连续的混合层。

结论

所评估的粘结系统的粘结强度和微观形态特征不受底物的影响。OU的结果较差。

相似文献

1
Microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin.不同粘结系统与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度
Pediatr Dent. 2005 Nov-Dec;27(6):457-62.
2
Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test.全酸蚀和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统在外周和中央牙本质组织上的黏结强度:微拉伸黏结强度测试
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 May 1;7(2):26-36.
3
Influence of aging treatments on microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to primary dentin.老化处理对粘结系统与乳牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 May-Aug;74(2):109-12.
4
Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.复合间接修复体与经粘接剂和低粘度复合树脂处理的牙本质的边缘适合性和微拉伸粘结强度
Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.028. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
5
The effect of direct and indirect water storage on the microtensile dentin bond strength of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives.直接和间接储水对一种全酸蚀和两种自酸蚀粘结剂的微拉伸牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 2007 Dec;20(6):370-4.
6
Effect of long-term water aging on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin.长期水老化对自酸蚀粘结剂与牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 2010 Feb;23(1):29-33.
7
Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.使用三种不同技术和一种粘结系统粘结后,两种陶瓷嵌体系统的牙本质粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):275-81. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.37.
8
Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin.自酸蚀底漆与磷酸酸蚀剂对与车针预备牙本质粘结的影响。
Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):447-54.
9
Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.即刻牙本质封闭有助于延迟修复体的放置。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Sep;98(3):166-74. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3.
10
Primary dentin etching time, bond strength and ultra-structure characterization of dentin surfaces.牙本质初次酸蚀时间、粘结强度与牙本质表面超微结构特征
J Dent. 2010 Mar;38(3):222-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Composite Restorations Bond on Primary Canines: An In Vitro Study.乳牙犬齿自粘复合树脂修复体粘结效果的体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Feb 15;15(2):e35005. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35005. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Clinical Effectiveness of Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainer and Band and Loop Space Maintainer in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.纤维增强复合间隙保持器和带环丝圈式间隙保持器在儿科患者中的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S82-S93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2044.
3
[Effects of three self-etch adhesives and mild salivary contamination on the bonding durability of deciduous teeth].
[三种自酸蚀粘结剂及轻度唾液污染对乳牙粘结耐久性的影响]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Dec 9;53(1):46-53. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.008.
4
Are self-etch adhesives reliable for primary tooth dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis.自酸蚀粘结剂用于乳牙牙本质是否可靠?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 May-Jun;21(3):243-250. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_287_17.
5
Comparative evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different solvent based one step and two step adhesive systems to dentin. An in-vitro study.不同溶剂型一步法和两步法粘结系统与牙本质微拉伸粘结强度的比较评估。一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):371-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114350.
6
Evaluation of the furcation area permeability of deciduous molars treated by neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or adhesive.评价使用钕:钇-铝-石榴石激光或黏接剂处理的乳牙分叉区的通透性。
Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Nov;25(6):873-80. doi: 10.1007/s10103-009-0730-z. Epub 2009 Sep 8.