Godfrey Stephanie S, Bull C Michael, Murray Kris, Gardner Michael G
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Parasitol Res. 2006 Aug;99(3):223-30. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0120-9. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
We explored patterns of infection of three apicomplexan blood parasites with different transmission mechanisms in 46 social groups across seven populations of the Australian lizard, Egernia stokesii. There was higher aggregation of infections within social groups for Hemolivia, transmitted by ticks, and Schellackia, either tick-transmitted or directly transmitted from mother to offspring, than for Plasmodium, with more mobile dipteran vectors. Prevalence was not related to group size, proximity to other groups or spatial overlap with adjacent groups for any of the parasites. However, for Hemolivia, groups with higher levels of relatedness among adults had higher parasite prevalence. Living in social groups leads to higher risk of infection for parasites with low transmission mobility. An unanswered question is why so few lizard species tolerate these risks to form stable social aggregations.
我们在澳大利亚蜥蜴艾氏石龙子(Egernia stokesii)七个种群的46个社会群体中,探究了三种具有不同传播机制的顶复门血液寄生虫的感染模式。通过蜱传播的血变原虫(Hemolivia)以及通过蜱传播或从母体直接传播给后代的谢氏原虫(Schellackia),在社会群体中的感染聚集程度高于通过更具移动性的双翅目媒介传播的疟原虫。对于任何一种寄生虫而言,感染率均与群体大小、与其他群体的距离或与相邻群体的空间重叠无关。然而,对于血变原虫来说,成年个体间亲缘关系较高的群体具有更高的寄生虫感染率。生活在社会群体中会增加传播流动性较低的寄生虫的感染风险。一个尚未解答的问题是,为什么只有极少数蜥蜴物种能够承受这些风险以形成稳定的社会聚集。