Shiratsuchi Hisaka, Komine Futoshi, Kakehashi Yoshiyuki, Matsumura Hideo
Department of Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Mar;95(3):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.01.009.
Gold electroformed metal-ceramic restorations have been promoted as alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. However, little is known about the relationship between tooth preparation design and marginal adaptation for this type of crown.
This study evaluated the influence of 3 different finish line designs on the marginal adaptation of electroformed metal copings and metal-ceramic crowns.
Three steel dies were prepared for maxillary central incisor crowns with 3 finish line designs: shoulder, rounded shoulder, and deep chamfer preparations. Eight standardized electroformed metal-ceramic crowns were fabricated for each group. Marginal discrepancies were measured at 60 points for each specimen along the circumferential margin at 4 sites (labial, mesial, lingual, and distal surfaces, with 15 points for each site) before and after firing procedures using a laser microscope. Data among the 3 different groups were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test with the Bonferroni correction. Marginal discrepancies between prefiring and postfiring procedures were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test (alpha = .05).
Significant differences in the marginal discrepancies of electroformed metal copings without porcelain and metal-ceramic crowns were found among all groups. The lowest range of median marginal discrepancy values (P < .05) at 4 sites, both before and after firing, occurred with the deep chamfer preparation (17.64-21.78 microm and 23.96-25.72 microm, respectively). The highest range values were observed in the shoulder preparation (38.13-49.89 microm and 73.87-89.44 microm, respectively). In all situations, the marginal discrepancies of the postfiring procedures were significantly greater (P = .02 or less) than those of the prefiring procedures.
Within the limitations of this study, the marginal adaptation of electroformed metal copings or metal-ceramic crowns is affected by finish line design and sequentially diminished by porcelain firing procedures.
金电铸金属陶瓷修复体已被推广作为传统金属陶瓷修复体的替代品。然而,对于这类牙冠的牙体预备设计与边缘适合性之间的关系却知之甚少。
本研究评估了3种不同肩台设计对电铸金属基底冠和金属陶瓷冠边缘适合性的影响。
为上颌中切牙牙冠制备了3个带有3种肩台设计的钢代型:肩台、圆钝肩台和深凹槽预备。每组制作8个标准化的电铸金属陶瓷冠。在烧结程序前后,使用激光显微镜在每个标本的4个部位(唇面、近中面、舌面和远中面,每个部位15个点)沿圆周边缘的60个点测量边缘差异。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和带有Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney U检验对3个不同组的数据进行统计学分析。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估烧结前和烧结后程序之间的边缘差异(α = 0.05)。
在所有组中,未加瓷的电铸金属基底冠和金属陶瓷冠的边缘差异存在显著差异。在烧结前后,4个部位的中位边缘差异值范围最低(P < 0.05)的是深凹槽预备(分别为17.64 - 21.78微米和23.96 - 25.72微米)。肩台预备观察到的范围值最高(分别为38.13 - 49.89微米和73.87 - 89.44微米)。在所有情况下,烧结后程序的边缘差异均显著大于(P = 0.02或更小)烧结前程序的边缘差异。
在本研究的局限性范围内,电铸金属基底冠或金属陶瓷冠的边缘适合性受肩台设计影响,并在随后的烤瓷烧结程序中降低。