Alqarawi Firas K, Sayed Mohammed E, Dewan Harisha, Ibraheem Shaabi Fawzia, Naim Hina, Ahmad Manawar, Ibrahim Hakami Hanan, Fihaid Alsubaiy Ebrahim, Sultan Areen, Saleh AlResayes Saad
Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Nov;36(11):1477-1482. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
This study evaluated the effects of finish-line design, tooth preparation taper or total occlusal convergence (TOC), and digital production technology on the retention of provisional crowns for molars.
Different taper angles (10° TOC and 20° TOC) and finish line designs (chamfer and shoulder) were used to prepare four mandibular first molar teeth. Two subgroups of the prepared teeth received temporary crowns that were either "Computer-Aided Design" and "Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled or 3D printed. Hence, eight test groups of temporary crowns containing 10 samples each were created. Groups 1-4 were milled, and Groups 5-8 were 3D printed specimens. A consistent procedure was used to cement 80 temporary crowns. The specimens were thermocycled for a total of 5000 heat cycles, initially at 5 °C for 30 s (dwell time) and then at 55 °C for 30 s. The pull-off force necessary to remove the temporary crowns was recorded, and the tensile strength, which served as the dependent variable, was calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the variations in retention forces among the test groups.
The mean tensile strengths at maximum load [MPa] were higher in Groups 5, 6, 7, 8 (6.6 MPa, 6.91 MPa, 7.65 MPa, and 7.45 MPa respectively) as compared to the mean tensile strengths at maximum load [MPa] in Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 (2.35 MPa, 3.52 MPa, 3.21 MPa, and 2.45 MPa respectively).
For extended periods, 3D-printed crowns with steeper preparation tapers (20° TOC) and shoulder finish lines exhibited enhanced retention.
本研究评估了边缘线设计、牙体预备锥度或全牙合聚合度(TOC)以及数字化制作技术对磨牙临时冠固位力的影响。
使用不同的锥度角(10° TOC和20° TOC)和边缘线设计(倒角和肩台)制备四颗下颌第一磨牙。制备好的牙齿的两个亚组分别接受“计算机辅助设计”和“计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)”铣削或3D打印的临时冠。由此,创建了八个临时冠测试组,每组包含10个样本。第1 - 4组为铣削样本,第5 - 8组为3D打印样本。采用一致的程序粘结80个临时冠。对样本进行总共5000次热循环,初始温度为5°C,持续30秒(保持时间),然后温度升至55°C,持续30秒。记录移除临时冠所需的拔出力,并计算作为因变量的拉伸强度。采用方差分析(ANOVA)评估测试组之间固位力的差异。
与第1、2、3、4组(最大载荷下的平均拉伸强度分别为2.35MPa、3.52MPa、3.