Green Andrew, Ross Duncan, Mirzoev Tolib
International Health Planning, Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, UK.
Health Policy. 2007 Jan;80(1):11-31. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
The Alma Ata Declaration is now 28 years old. This article uses its framework to assess the changes that have occurred in recent years in the English health system. It summarises the health reform changes that have occurred internationally and those in the English health system in two eras, pre- and post-1997 - when the Labour Party came to power. It concludes that linked forces of managerialism and consumerism have had an impact on the health system which has undergone a number of structural changes in recent years. It suggests that the original Alma Ata focus on equity is being modified by the concept of choice. The tensions between central priorities, often reflected in targets, and local accountability and needs are explored. There appears to be a greater interest in seeking genuine health (rather than solely health care) change, with attendant public health and partnership policies, however the gap between policy and practice still needs to be bridged, and questions as to the appropriate locus and leadership for health promotion activities addressed. However there have been numerous institutional changes which carry the danger of distracting from the purpose of achieving health change, and which continue to raise questions as to the appropriateness of a market model for health. Finally the paper argues that the PHC framework of Alma Ata remains a useful framework for assessing health systems, but needs to be tailored to, and prioritised within, a political dynamic.
《阿拉木图宣言》问世至今已有28年。本文运用其框架来评估近年来英国卫生系统所发生的变化。它总结了国际上以及英国卫生系统在两个时期——1997年工党执政之前和之后——所发生的卫生改革变化。结论是,管理主义和消费主义这两种相互关联的力量对卫生系统产生了影响,近年来该系统经历了一些结构变革。这表明,《阿拉木图宣言》最初对公平的关注正被选择的概念所改变。探讨了通常体现在目标中的核心优先事项与地方问责制及需求之间的紧张关系。人们似乎对寻求真正的健康(而非仅仅是医疗保健)变革以及随之而来的公共卫生和伙伴关系政策更感兴趣,然而政策与实践之间的差距仍需弥合,并且要解决健康促进活动的适当场所和领导力问题。不过,已经发生了众多机构变革,存在偏离实现健康变革目标的风险,并且继续引发关于卫生市场模式适当性的问题。最后,本文认为《阿拉木图宣言》的初级卫生保健框架仍然是评估卫生系统的有用框架,但需要根据政治动态进行调整并确定优先次序。